Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29175767›Full record

ArticleHearing research2018

Effects of noise overexposure on tone detection in noise in nonhuman primates.

Samantha N Hauser, Jane A Burton, Evan T Mercer, Ramnarayan Ramachandran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Three psychophysical metrics of auditory temporal integration in macaques.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The use of nonhuman primates in studies of noise injury and treatment.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha N HauserDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: samantha.n.hauser@vanderbilt.edu.
Jane A BurtonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: jane.a.burton@vanderbilt.edu.
Evan T MercerVanderbilt University Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience for Undergraduates, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA. Electronic address: evan.t.mercer@vanderbilt.edu.
Ramnarayan RamachandranDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: ramnarayan.ramachandran@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Training in Fundamental NeuroscienceT32MH064913 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI IHRIE, REBECCA A, WINDER, DANNY G. · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Developing Research Careers in the Hearing Sciences IIT35DC008763 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LINDA J. HOOD · 2007 to 2026
$533k
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008763NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH064913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report explores the consequences of acoustic overexposures on hearing in noisy environments for two macaque monkeys trained to perform a reaction time detection task using a Go/No-Go lever release paradigm. Behavioral and non-invasive physiological assessments were obtained before and after narrowband noise exposure. Physiological measurements showed elevated auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and absent distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) post-exposure relative to pre-exposure. Audiograms revealed frequency specific increases in tone detection thresholds, with the greatest increases at the exposure band frequency and higher. Masked detection was affected in a similar frequency specific manner: threshold shift rates (change of masked threshold per dB increase in noise level) were lower than pre-exposure values at frequencies higher than the exposure band. Detection thresholds in sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) noise post-exposure showed no difference from those in unmodulated noise, whereas pre-exposure masked detection thresholds were lower in the presence of SAM noise compared to unmodulated noise. These frequency-dependent results were correlated with cochlear histopathological changes in monkeys that underwent similar noise exposure. These results reveal that behavioral and physiological effects of noise exposure in macaques are similar to those seen in humans and provide preliminary information on the relationship between noise exposure, cochlear pathology and perceptual changes in hearing within individual subjects.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalPitch PerceptionSignal Detection, PsychologicalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCochleaEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearing Loss, Noise-InducedMacacaMaleNoiseOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousPerceptual DistortionPerceptual Masking

Identifiers

PMID29175767
PMCPMC5743633
OpenAlexW2767552276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.