Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29175679›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2018

Monitoring microbial communities using light sheet fluorescence microscopy.

Raghuveer Parthasarathy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Spatial microenvironments tune immune response dynamics in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Characterizing trajectories of innate immune cells in larval zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ThemBio · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Raghuveer ParthasarathyDepartment of Physics, The University of Oregon, United States. Electronic address: raghu@uoregon.edu.

Funding

Zebrafish FacilityP01HD022486 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI EISEN, JUDITH S · 1987 to 2017
$28.8M
Research Area IIIP50GM098911 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PARTHASARATHY, RAGHUVEER · 2012 to 2016
$9.8M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD022486NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM098911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes often live in dense, dynamic, multi-species communities whose architecture and function are intimately intertwined. Imaging these complex, three-dimensional ensembles presents considerable technical challenges, however. In this review, I describe light sheet fluorescence microscopy, a technique that enables rapid acquisition of three-dimensional images over large fields of view and over long durations, and I highlight recent applications of this method to microbial systems that include artificial closed ecosystems, bacterial biofilms, and gut microbiota. I comment also on the history of light sheet imaging and the many variants of the method. Light sheet techniques have tremendous potential for illuminating the workings of microbial communities, a potential that is just beginning to be realized.

Indexed as

LightMicrobiotaBiofilmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID29175679
PMCPMC5963963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.