Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29175548›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2018

Radiology report annotation using intelligent word embeddings: Applied to multi-institutional chest CT cohort.

Imon Banerjee, Matthew C Chen, Matthew P Lungren, Daniel L Rubin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neural Network Assisted Pathology Case Identification.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Deep learning in clinical natural language processing: a methodical review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Review
  19. Self-Supervised Contextual Language Representation of Radiology Reports to Improve the Identification of Communication Urgency.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Imon BanerjeeDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: imonb@stanford.edu.
Matthew C ChenDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: rubin@stanford.edu.
Matthew P LungrenDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: mcc17@stanford.edu.
Daniel L RubinDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: mlungren@stanford.edu.
Stanford Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

Qualification and Deployment of Imaging Biomarkers of Cancer Treatment ResponseU01CA190214 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2020
$3.1M
Computing, Optimizing, and Evaluating Quantitative Cancer Imaging BiomarkersU01CA187947 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NAPEL, SANDY A., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Computerized Quantitative Imaging Assessment of Tumor BurdenU01CA142555 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA142555NCI NIH HHS U01 CA187947NCI NIH HHS U01 CA190214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We proposed an unsupervised hybrid method - Intelligent Word Embedding (IWE) that combines neural embedding method with a semantic dictionary mapping technique for creating a dense vector representation of unstructured radiology reports. We applied IWE to generate embedding of chest CT radiology reports from two healthcare organizations and utilized the vector representations to semi-automate report categorization based on clinically relevant categorization related to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). We benchmark the performance against a state-of-the-art rule-based tool, PeFinder and out-of-the-box word2vec. On the Stanford test set, the IWE model achieved average F1 score 0.97, whereas the PeFinder scored 0.9 and the original word2vec scored 0.94. On UPMC dataset, the IWE model's average F1 score was 0.94, when the PeFinder scored 0.92 and word2vec scored 0.85. The IWE model had lowest generalization error with highest F1 scores. Of particular interest, the IWE model (trained on the Stanford dataset) outperformed PeFinder on the UPMC dataset which was used originally to tailor the PeFinder model.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedHumansNatural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Value of TestsPulmonary EmbolismRadiography, ThoracicSemanticsTomography, X-Ray ComputedInformation extractionPulmonary embolismReport annotationWord embedding

Identifiers

PMID29175548
PMCPMC5771955
OpenAlexW2769783090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.