Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29175225›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2017

'Pastoral practices' for quality improvement in a Kenyan clinical network.

Gerry McGivern, Jacinta Nzinga, Mike English

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gerry McGivernWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV47AL, UK. Electronic address: Gerry.mcgivern@wbs.ac.uk.
Jacinta NzingaKEMRI Wellcome Trust, Nairobi, Kenya. Electronic address: JNzinga@kemri-wellcome.org.
Mike EnglishKEMRI Wellcome Trust, Nairobi, Kenya; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, UK. Electronic address: MEnglish@kemri-wellcome.org.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 097170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explain social and organisational processes influencing health professionals in a Kenyan clinical network to implement a form of quality improvement (QI) into clinical practice, using the concept of 'pastoral practices'. Our qualitative empirical case study, conducted in 2015-16, shows the way practices constructing and linking local evidence-based guidelines and data collection processes provided a foundation for QI. Participation in these constructive practices gave network leaders pastoral status to then inscribe use of evidence and data into routine care, through championing, demonstrating, supporting and mentoring, with the support of a constellation of local champions. By arranging network meetings, in which the professional community discussed evidence, data, QI and professionalism, network leaders also facilitated the reconstruction of network members' collective professional identity. This consequently strengthened top-down and lateral accountability and inspection practices, disciplining evidence and audit-based QI in local hospitals. By explaining pastoral practices in this way and setting, we contribute to theory about governmentality in health care and extend Foucauldian analysis of QI, clinical networks and governance into low and middle income health care contexts.

Indexed as

Pastoral CareEvidence-Based PracticeHospitals, PediatricHumansKenyaLeadershipPersonnel, HospitalQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementSocial SupportClinical governanceClinical networksGovernmentalityKenyaLeadershipLow and middle income countriesPastoral powerQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID29175225
PMCPMC5718766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.