Predictive accuracy of medical transport information for in-hospital mortality.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. High-risk diagnosis combinations in patients undergoing interhospital transfer: a retrospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2022
   Observational
2. Lessons learned from the first 50 COVID-19 critical care transfer missions conducted by a civilian UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Service team.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022
   Article
3. Pre-hospital care & interfacility transport of 385 COVID-19 emergency patients: an air ambulance perspective.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020
   Article
4. Complexity of nursing care at 24 h from admission predicts in-hospital mortality in medical units: a cohort study.BMC health services research · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as