ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2018
Physician Intervention to Positive Depression Screens Among Adolescents in Primary Care.
Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2019Trial
- An Item-Level Analysis of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Among Adolescents in Primary Care.Clinical practice in pediatric psychology · 2026Article
- Using formative research to inform a mental health intervention for adolescents living in Indian slums: the ARTEMIS study.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2024Article
- Perceived Facilitators of and Barriers to Implementation of a Decision Support Tool for Adolescent Depression and Suicidality Screening: Focus Group and Interview Study.JMIR mental health · 2021Article
- A breakthrough in research on depression screening: from validation to efficacy studies.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2021Article
- Suicidality and Its Associated Factors Among Students in Rural China During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study of Left-Behind and Non-Left-Behind Children.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Drivers of and Solutions for the Overuse of Antidepressant Medication in Pediatric Populations.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- The Natural Course of Adolescent Depression Treatment in the Primary Care Setting.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & PractitionersArticle
- Improving Primary Care Adolescent Depression Screening and Initial Management: A Quality Improvement Study.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2018
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of computer-based screening and physician feedback to guide adolescent depression management within primary care.
methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study within two clinics of the computer-based depression screening and physician feedback algorithm among youth aged 12-20 years between October 2014 and October 2015 in Marion County (Indianapolis), Indiana.
resultsOur sample included 2,038 youth (51% female; 60% black; mean age = 14.6 years [standard deviation = 2.1]). Over 20% of youth screened positive for depression on the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and 303 youth (14.8%) screened positive on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The most common follow-up action by physicians was a referral to mental health services (34.2% mild, 46.8% moderate, and 72.2% severe range). Almost 11% of youth in the moderate range and 22.7% of youth in the severe range were already prescribed a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. When predicting mental health service referral, significant predictors in the multivariate analysis included clinic site (40.2% vs. 73.9%; p < .0001) and PHQ-9 score (severe range 77.8% vs. mild range 47.5%; p < .01). Similarly, when predicting initiation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, only clinic site (28.6% vs. 6.9%; p < .01) and PHQ-9 score (severe range 46.7% vs. moderate range 10.6%; p < .001) were significant.
conclusionsWhen a computer-based decision support system algorithm focused on adolescent depression was implemented in two primary care clinics, a majority of physicians utilized screening results to guide clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.