Trial reportGastroenterology2018
Computed Tomography Colonography vs Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance After Surgery.
Trial report in Gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02143115 (Comparative Effectiveness of Virtual and Optical Colonoscopy for Colorectal), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness of Virtual and Optical Colonoscopy for Colorectal (CRC) Surveillance
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.European radiology · 2021Guideline
- Guideline
- Pooled it
- Symptoms and diagnostic criteria of acquired Megacolon - a systematic literature review.BMC gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Post-operative colorectal cancer surveillance: preference for optical colonoscopy over computerized tomographic colonography.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2019Trial
- Missed colorectal cancer diagnosis by screening colonoscopy based on the PLCO cancer screening trial.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- CT colonography: revisited after 30 years.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- [Imaging of colorectal cancer: Role of computed tomography colonography].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Current advance of nanotechnology in diagnosis and treatment for malignant tumors.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Article
- Radiologic Imaging Modalities for Colorectal Cancer.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies in high-risk individuals.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative colon cancer screening strategies in the context of the French national screening program.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2020Article
- When Colonoscopy Fails… Refer, Repeat, and Succeed.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Yield and Cost-effectiveness of Computed Tomography Colonography Versus Colonoscopy for Post Colorectal Cancer Surveillance.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsRecommendations for surveillance after curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) include a 1-year post-resection abdominal-pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan and optical colonoscopy (OC). CT colonography (CTC), when used in CRC screening, effectively identifies colorectal polyps ≥10 mm and cancers. We performed a prospective study to determine whether CTC, concurrent with CT, could substitute for OC in CRC surveillance.
methodsOur study enrolled 231 patients with resected stage 0-III CRC, identified at 5 tertiary care academic centers. Approximately 1 year after surgery, participants underwent outpatient CTC plus CT, followed by same-day OC. CTC results were revealed after endoscopic visualization of sequential colonic segments, which were re-examined for discordant findings. The primary outcome was performance of CTC in the detection of colorectal adenomas and cancers using endoscopy as the reference standard.
resultsOf the 231 participants, 116 (50.2%) had polyps of any size or histology identified by OC, and 15.6% had conventional adenomas and/or serrated polyps ≥6 mm. No intra-luminal cancers were detected. CTC detected patients with polyps of ≥6 mm with 44.0% sensitivity (95% CI, 30.2-57.8) and 93.4% specificity (95% CI, 89.7-97.0). CTC detected polyps ≥10 mm with 76.9% sensitivity (95% CI, 54.0-99.8) and 89.0% specificity (95% CI, 84.8-93.1). Similar values were found when only adenomatous polyps were considered. The negative predictive value of CTC for adenomas ≥6 mm was 90.7% (95% CI, 86.7-94.5) and for adenomas ≥10 mm the negative predictive value was 98.6% (95% CI, 97.0-100).
conclusionsIn a CRC surveillance population 1 year following resection, CTC was inferior to OC for detecting patients with polyps ≥6 mm. Clinical Trials.gov Registration Number: NCT02143115.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.