Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29174894›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

Disruption of Perceptual Learning by a Brief Practice Break.

David F Little, Yu-Xuan Zhang, Beverly A Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Priority coding in the visual system.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  4. Non-sensory Influences on Auditory Learning and Plasticity.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David F LittleDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3550, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. Electronic address: david.frank.little@gmail.com.
Yu-Xuan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Beverly A WrightDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3550, USA.

Funding

LEARNING ON BASIC AUDITORY TASKSR01DC004453 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, BEVERLY A · 2001 to 2009
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some forms of associative learning require only a single experience to create a lasting memory [1, 2]. In contrast, perceptual learning often requires extensive practice within a day for performance to improve across days [3, 4]. This suggests that the requisite practice for durable perceptual learning is integrated throughout each day. If the total amount of daily practice is the only important variable, then a practice break within a day should not disrupt across-day improvement. To test this idea, we trained human listeners on an auditory frequency-discrimination task over multiple days and compared the performance of those who engaged in a single continuous practice session each day [4] with those who were given a 30-min break halfway through each practice session. Continuous practice yielded significant perceptual learning [4]. In contrast, practice with a rest break led to no improvement, indicating that the integration process had decayed within 30 min. In a separate experiment, a 30-min practice break also disrupted durable learning on a non-native phonetic classification task. These results suggest that practice trials are integrated up to a learning threshold within a transient memory store before they are sent en masse into a memory that lasts across days. Thus, the oft cited benefits of distributed over massed training [5, 6] may arise from different mechanisms depending on whether the breaks occur before or after a learning threshold has been reached. Trial integration could serve as an early gatekeeper to plasticity, helping to ensure that longer-lasting changes are only made when deemed worthwhile.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMemoryAdolescentFemaleHumansLearningMaleTime FactorsYoung Adultdistributed trainingfrequency discriminationmassed trainingmemory consolidationnon-native consonantsperceptual learningspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID29174894
PMCPMC5848209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.