ReviewPhysiology & behavior2018
Considering sex differences in the cognitive controls of feeding.
Review in Physiology & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxytocin Effects on Food Stimulus Processing and Food Intake in Females With or Without Binge Eating Disorder.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Trial
- Sex specific effects of a high fat diet on metabolism, cognition, and pathology in the Tg-SwDI mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Sex differences and the roles of sex steroids in energy intake regulation and high-fat diet preference during free-choice feeding in young adult rats.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Impact of satiety on palatable food associative learning and consumption in male and female adult rats.Physiology & behavior · 2025Article
- Current evidence on gender-related risk factors for type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and prediabetes: a reappraisal of the Italian study group on gender difference in endocrine diseases.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025Review
- Obesity: a gender-view.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Review
- Nine-month-long Social Isolation Changes the Levels of Monoamines in the Brain Structures of Rats: A Comparative Study of Neurochemistry and Behavior.Neurochemical research · 2023Article
- Macronutrient intake: Hormonal controls, pathological states, and methodological considerations.Appetite · 2023Review
- The Effects of Oxytocin on Appetite Regulation, Food Intake and Metabolism in Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Female mice are more prone to develop an addictive-like phenotype for sugar consumption.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The dynamic association between body mass index and cognition from midlife through late-life, and the effect of sex and genetic influences.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Sex Differences and Estrous Influences on Oxytocin Control of Food Intake.Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Curdlan Prevents the Cognitive Deficits Induced by a High-Fat Diet in Mice via the Gut-Brain Axis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- The effects of a GLP-1 analog liraglutide on reward value and the learned inhibition of appetitive behavior in male and female rats.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2019Article
- Neonatal Consumption of Oligosaccharides Greatly Increases L-Cell Density without Significant Consequence for Adult Eating Behavior.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Differential Effects of Dietary MSG on Hippocampal Dependent Memory Are Mediated by Diet.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Women are disproportionately affected by obesity, and obesity increases women's risk of developing dementia more so than men. Remarkably little is known about how females make decisions about when and how much to eat. Research in animal models with males supports a framework in which previous experiences with external food cues and internal physiological energy states, and the ability to retrieve memories of the consequences of eating, determines subsequent food intake. Additional evidence indicates that consumption of a high-fat, high-sugar diet interferes with hippocampal-dependent mnemonic processes that operate to suppress eating, such as in situations of satiety. Recent findings also indicate that weakening this form of hippocampal-dependent inhibitory control may also extend to other forms of learning and memory, perpetuating a vicious cycle of increased Western diet intake, hippocampal dysfunction, and further impairments in the suppression of appetitive behavior that may ultimately disrupt other types of memorial interference resolution. How these basic learning and memory processes operate in females to guide food intake has received little attention. Ovarian hormones appear to protect females from obesity and metabolic impairments, as well as modulate learning and memory processes, but little is known about how these hormones modulate learned appetitive behavior. Even less is known about how a sex-specific environmental factor - widespread hormonal contraceptive use - affects associative learning and the regulation of food intake. Extending learned models of food intake to females will require considerably investigation at many levels (e.g., reproductive status, hormonal compound, parity). This work could yield critical insights into the etiology of obesity, and its concomitant cognitive impairment, for both sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.