Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29174530›Full record

ArticleEuropean neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018

Increased cortical neuronal responses to NMDA and improved attentional set-shifting performance in rats following prebiotic (B-GOS

Benjamin Gronier, Helene M Savignac, Mathieu Di Miceli, Sherif M Idriss, George Tzortzis, Daniel Anthony, Philip W J Burnet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Probiotics in Postoperative Pain Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. When the microbiome helps the brain-current evidence.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  15. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The Role of the Human Microbiome in the Pathogenesis of Pain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin GronierLeicester School of Pharmacy, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.
Helene M Savignac4D Pharma, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen AB25 2ZS, UK.
Mathieu Di MiceliLeicester School of Pharmacy, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.
Sherif M IdrissCenter of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany.
George TzortzisClasado Biosciences Ltd., Reading RG6 6BZ, UK.
Daniel AnthonyDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QT, UK.
Philip W J BurnetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK. Electronic address: phil.burnet@psych.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I006311/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously shown that prebiotics (dietary fibres that augment the growth of indigenous beneficial gut bacteria) such as Bimuno

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimalsAttentionCerebral CortexExecutive FunctionMaleMembrane PotentialsNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsN-MethylaspartatePrebioticsRandom AllocationRats, Sprague-DawleyTriglyceridesNeurotransmitter AgentsN-MethylaspartatePrebioticstributyrinTriglyceridesCognitionElectrophysiologyGlutamateMicrobiotaShort-chain fatty acid

Identifiers

PMID29174530
PMCPMC5857269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.