Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29172768›Full record

ArticleJournal of health and social behavior2017

Planning for Future Care and the End of Life: A Qualitative Analysis of Gay, Lesbian, and Heterosexual Couples.

Mieke Beth Thomeer, Rachel Donnelly, Corinne Reczek, Debra Umberson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health and social behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Impact of Self-Reported Healthcare Stereotype Threat on Advance Care Planning Among Older, Sexual Minority Adults: A Black and White Difference.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mieke Beth Thomeer1 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Rachel Donnelly2 University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Corinne Reczek3 The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Debra Umberson2 University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Population Research CenterR24HD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI HAYWARD, MARK D. · 2002 to 2016
$8.4M
Training Program in Population StudiesT32HD007081 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Aprile Dawn Benner, Abigail Mae Weitzman · 1985 to 2026
$6.8M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Relationships and Health: Comparing Union TypesR21AG044585 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI UMBERSON, DEBRA J. · 2013 to 2014
$428k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG044585NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042849NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two key components of end-of-life planning are (1) informal discussions about future care and other end-of-life preferences and (2) formal planning via living wills and other legal documents. We leverage previous work on the institutional aspects of marriage and on sexual-minority discrimination to theorize why and how heterosexual, gay, and lesbian married couples engage in informal and formal end-of-life planning. We analyze qualitative dyadic in-depth interviews with 45 midlife gay, lesbian, and heterosexual married couples ( N = 90 spouses). Findings suggest that same-sex spouses devote considerable attention to informal planning conversations and formal end-of-life plans, while heterosexual spouses report minimal formal or informal planning. The primary reasons same-sex spouses give for making end-of-life preparations are related to the absence of legal protections and concerns about discrimination from families. These findings raise questions about future end-of-life planning for same- and different-sex couples given a rapidly shifting legal and social landscape.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningFamily CharacteristicsHeterosexualityMarriageSexual and Gender MinoritiesTerminal CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchagingdyadic qualitative analysisend-of-life planningmarriagesexual minorities

Identifiers

PMID29172768
PMCPMC5718053
OpenAlexW2763837262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.