Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29171062›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2018

Mixture drug-count response model for the high-dimensional drug combinatory effect on myopathy.

Xueying Wang, Pengyue Zhang, Chien-Wei Chiang, Hengyi Wu, Li Shen, Xia Ning, Donglin Zeng, Lei Wang, Sara K Quinney, Weixing Feng and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pattern Discovery from High-Order Drug-Drug Interaction Relations.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xueying WangInstitute of Intelligent System and Bioinformatics, College of Automation, Harbin Engineering University, NO.145-1, Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6350-7998
Pengyue ZhangCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W. 10th St., Suite 5000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Chien-Wei ChiangCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W. 10th St., Suite 5000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Hengyi WuCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W. 10th St., Suite 5000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Li ShenCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W. 10th St., Suite 5000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Xia NingCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W. 10th St., Suite 5000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Donglin ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3103B McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7420, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Lei WangInstitute of Intelligent System and Bioinformatics, College of Automation, Harbin Engineering University, NO.145-1, Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Sara K QuinneyCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W. 10th St., Suite 5000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Weixing FengInstitute of Intelligent System and Bioinformatics, College of Automation, Harbin Engineering University, NO.145-1, Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Lang LiCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W. 10th St., Suite 5000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USHarbin Engineering University · CNUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Clinical Importance of Drug-Drug InteractionsR01AG025152 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN, LI, LANG · 2006 to 2021
$8.1M
Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Improve Dynamic Treatment Regimens Estimation Using Real World Data.R01GM124104 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Yuanjia Wang, Donglin Zeng · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Antidiabetic AgentsR01DK102694 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN, LI, LANG · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
Evidence-based Drug-Interaction Discovery: In-Vivo, In-Vitro and ClinicalR01LM011945 · NLM · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LI, LANG, ROCHA, LUIS M · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
A Translational Bioinformatics Approach in the Drug Interaction ResearchR01GM104483 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, LANG · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
Integrated bioinformatic and pharmacokinetic models of high-dimensional drug interactionsR01GM117206 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI QUINNEY, SARA K · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025152NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK102694NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104483NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117206NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124104NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a common cause of adverse drug events (ADEs). The electronic medical record (EMR) database and the FDA's adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database are the major data sources for mining and testing the ADE associated DDI signals. Most DDI data mining methods focus on pair-wise drug interactions, and methods to detect high-dimensional DDIs in medical databases are lacking. In this paper, we propose 2 novel mixture drug-count response models for detecting high-dimensional drug combinations that induce myopathy. The "count" indicates the number of drugs in a combination. One model is called fixed probability mixture drug-count response model with a maximum risk threshold (FMDRM-MRT). The other model is called count-dependent probability mixture drug-count response model with a maximum risk threshold (CMDRM-MRT), in which the mixture probability is count dependent. Compared with the previous mixture drug-count response model (MDRM) developed by our group, these 2 new models show a better likelihood in detecting high-dimensional drug combinatory effects on myopathy. CMDRM-MRT identified and validated (54; 374; 637; 442; 131) 2-way to 6-way drug interactions, respectively, which induce myopathy in both EMR and FAERS databases. We further demonstrate FAERS data capture much higher maximum myopathy risk than EMR data do. The consistency of 2 mixture models' parameters and local false discovery rate estimates are evaluated through statistical simulation studies.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsModels, StatisticalAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAlgorithmsBiostatisticsComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualData MiningDrug Therapy, CombinationElectronic Health RecordsHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, BiologicalMuscular DiseasesRisk Factorsdrug-count response modelelectronic medical recordFDA's adverse event reporting systemhigh-dimensional drug interactionsmyopathy

Identifiers

PMID29171062
PMCPMC5771837
OpenAlexW2770257788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.