Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29170972›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2018

The accessibility and utilization of genetic testing for inherited heart rhythm disorders: a Canadian cross-sectional survey study.

Thomas M Roston, Laura Dewar, Sonia Franciosi, Julie Hathaway, Kirsten Bartels, Taylor Cunningham, Karen A Gibbs, Sam Sheps, Zachary W M Laksman, Shubhayan Sanatani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas M RostonBC Inherited Arrhythmia Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Laura DewarSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Sonia FranciosiChildren's Heart Centre, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Julie HathawayBC Inherited Arrhythmia Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kirsten BartelsBC Inherited Arrhythmia Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Taylor CunninghamChildren's Heart Centre, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Karen A GibbsBC Inherited Arrhythmia Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sam ShepsUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Zachary W M LaksmanBC Inherited Arrhythmia Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shubhayan SanataniBC Inherited Arrhythmia Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Andrew D KrahnBC Inherited Arrhythmia Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada. akrahn@mail.ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic basis of many sudden death-related conditions has been elucidated. These include inherited arrhythmias and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, termed inherited heart rhythm disorders (IHRD). Advising on and interpreting genetic testing is challenging for the general cardiologist. This has led to the development of interdisciplinary clinics for IHRD in varying stages of establishment in Canada. We sought the viewpoints and patterns of practice of Canadian IHRD experts, and assessed their ability to access genetic testing for IHRD using a national cross-sectional survey. Of 56 participants, most were physicians (68%) or genetic counselors (19%). Despite working collaboratively, most genetic counselors (59%) were either not satisfied or only somewhat satisfied with their relationships with physicians. Ninety percent of participants were involved in offering genetic evaluation, including 80% who felt that testing was usually/always accessible. Most offered genetic testing to confirm clinical diagnosis and/or direct family screening. Post-mortem genetic analysis was sought by 69% of respondents; however, a lack of retained tissue and/or poor tissue preparation hindered this process. Family screening was usually recommended in the setting of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant. The most commonly perceived barrier to genetic testing was cost to the healthcare system. More than a quarter of patients waited ≥ 6 months for funding. An ability to engage at-risk relatives was rated as limited/poor by 34% of participants. Despite the establishment of several interdisciplinary clinics, timely access to affordable testing, supported by strong team communication, continues to be a barrier to genetic testing in Canada.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathyCardiovascular geneticsChannelopathyInherited arrhythmiaSudden death

Identifiers

PMID29170972
PMCPMC6002300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.