Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29170898›Full record

ReviewGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2018

Reconsideration of frailty in relation to surgical indication.

Kay Maeda, Yoshikatsu Saiki

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kay MaedaDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Seiryocho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Yoshikatsu SaikiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Seiryocho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan. yoshisaiki@med.tohoku.ac.jp.
Tohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given that an increasing number of elderly patients are undergoing surgical procedures for a diversity of indications, the concept of frailty is currently being examined in more depth in clinical medicine. Established surgical risk scores designed to predict mortality are mainly focused on general demographic information and clinical factors; however, these do not account for the frailty condition. With vulnerability and low resiliency in the frail elderly, these conventional scores are unable to accurately predict postoperative outcomes including adverse complications, disability, the need for additional rehabilitation, and prolonged length of hospitalization. Over the last decade, it has been demonstrated that frailty is an independent risk factor of surgery and strongly associated with adverse postoperative outcomes and mortality. It is essential today that surgeons assimilate the concept of frailty and the relationship between frailty and surgical outcomes. A preoperative frailty assessment can assist in determining surgical indication and optimal perioperative management, ultimately impacting the postoperative functional state and quality of life. Here we review the validity of preoperative frailty assessments for surgical intervention, possible treatments for frailty, and indicate future directions in this field.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentAgedFrailtyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsComplicationsFrailtyPreoperative assessmentSarcopeniaSurgery

Identifiers

PMID29170898
OpenAlexW2769572234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.