Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29170877›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2018

Oral anticoagulant dosing, administration, and storage: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian health care providers.

Siavash Piran, Sam Schulman, Mohamed Panju, Menaka Pai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants: A Resident-Based Workshop to Improve Knowledge and Confidence.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Direct oral anticoagulants: a review of common medication errors.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siavash PiranDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Thromboembolism, and Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Sam SchulmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Thromboembolism, and Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Mohamed PanjuDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Menaka PaiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Thromboembolism, and Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. mpai@mcmaster.ca.
McMaster University · CAThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is increasing worldwide. However, if not taken or prescribed correctly, DOACs have serious side effects. It is crucial that healthcare providers (HCPs) offer patients accurate information and counselling around DOACs, to optimize safe and effective use. To assess knowledge around oral anticoagulant indication, dosing, storage, and administration, an electronic survey was distributed to HCPs across Canada from June to August 2017, with 18 questions on the practical use of oral anticoagulants. A total of 191 responses were received: 100 from nurse practitioners, 42 from pharmacists, 27 from Hematologists, 5 from Thrombosis specialists, 4 from internists, 9 from residents and fellows, and 2 each from family physicians and registered nurses. Only 51 (26.7%) of the respondents correctly identified all the approved indications for warfarin and 4 DOACs. Only 101 (52.9%) correctly identified that DOACs are not approved for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, cerebral sinus venous thrombosis, or mechanical prosthetic valves. 112 (58.6%) felt comfortable or very comfortable prescribing oral anticoagulants. Half of the respondents knew that dabigatran should not be crushed, however only 85 (44.5%) knew that it should not be exposed to moisture. 94 (49%) knew that higher dose rivaroxaban should be taken with food. The results of our study demonstrate that there are important knowledge gaps around HCPs' practical understanding of oral anticoagulants. Future research should focus on educational interventions to improve HCPs' knowledge around indications, dosing, storage, and administration, with the goal of enhancing patient safety.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnticoagulantsCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesDrug StorageHealth PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAnticoagulantsAdministrationCounselingIndicationOral anticoagulantsStorage

Identifiers

PMID29170877
OpenAlexW2769346745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.