Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29170872›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2018

New insights from molecular phylogenetics of amoebophagous fungi (Zoopagomycota, Zoopagales).

Daniele Corsaro, Martina Köhsler, Claudia Wylezich, Danielle Venditti, Julia Walochnik, Rolf Michel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatial Variation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Fungal evolution: diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of the Fungi.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019
    Article
  12. Fungal evolution: major ecological adaptations and evolutionary transitions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019
    Review
  13. Fungi in aquatic ecosystems.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The 'Amoeboid Predator-Fungal Animal Virulence' Hypothesis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniele CorsaroChlamydia Research Association (CHLAREAS), 12 rue du Maconnais, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. corsaro@gmx.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1754-1546
Martina KöhslerMolecular Parasitology, Institute for Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Claudia WylezichInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Danielle VendittiChlamydia Research Association (CHLAREAS), 12 rue du Maconnais, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Julia WalochnikMolecular Parasitology, Institute for Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Rolf MichelCentral Institute of the Federal Armed Forces Medical Services, P.O. Box 7340, D 56070, Koblenz, Germany.
Medical University of Vienna · ATCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amoebophagous fungi are represented in all fungal groups: Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, Zygomycota, and Chytridiomycota. The amoebophagous fungi, within the zygomycota (Zoopagales, Zoopagomycota), mainly affect naked amoebae as ectoparasites or endoparasites. It is rather difficult to isolate members of the Zoopagales, because of their parasitic lifestyle, and to bring them into culture. Consequently, gene sequences of this group are undersampled, and its species composition and phylogeny are relatively unknown. In the present study, we were able to isolate amoebophagous fungi together with their amoeba hosts from various habitats (moss, pond, bark, and soil). Altogether, four fungal strains belonging to the genera Acaulopage and Stylopage plus one unidentified isolate were detected. Sequences of the 18S rDNA and the complete ITS region and partial 28S (LSU) rDNA were generated. Subsequent phylogenetic analyses showed that all new isolates diverge at one branch together with two environmental clonal sequences within the Zoopagomycota. Here, we provide the first molecular characterization of the genus Stylopage. Stylopage is closely related to the genus Acaulopage. In addition, taxonomy and phylogeny of amoebophagous fungi and their ecological importance are reviewed based on new sequence data, which includes environmental clonal sequences.

Indexed as

AmoebaDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalFungiMolecular TypingPhylogenyDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalAcaulopageAmoebophagous fungiFree-living amoebaeStylopageZoopagalesZygomycetes

Identifiers

PMID29170872
OpenAlexW2771027839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.