Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29170503›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2017

Mutational and putative neoantigen load predict clinical benefit of adoptive T cell therapy in melanoma.

Martin Lauss, Marco Donia, Katja Harbst, Rikke Andersen, Shamik Mitra, Frida Rosengren, Maryem Salim, Johan Vallon-Christersson, Therese Törngren, Anders Kvist and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 333 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
333citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

333 citing papers in PubMed, 486 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

273 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin LaussDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Marco DoniaCenter for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Hematology, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Katja HarbstDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Rikke AndersenCenter for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Hematology, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Shamik MitraDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Frida RosengrenDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Maryem SalimDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Johan Vallon-ChristerssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-0385
Therese TörngrenDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Anders KvistDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1358-0695
Markus RingnérDepartment of Biology, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Lund University, Sölvegatan 35, 22362, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5469-8940
Inge Marie SvaneCenter for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Hematology, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Göran JönssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEHerlev Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) is a highly intensive immunotherapy regime that has yielded remarkable response rates and many durable responses in clinical trials in melanoma; however, 50-60% of the patients have no clinical benefit. Here, we searched for predictive biomarkers to ACT in melanoma. Whole exome- and transcriptome sequencing and neoantigen prediction were applied to pre-treatment samples from 27 patients recruited to a clinical phase I/II trial of ACT in stage IV melanoma. All patients had previously progressed on other immunotherapies. We report that clinical benefit is associated with significantly higher predicted neoantigen load. High mutation and predicted neoantigen load are significantly associated with improved progression-free and overall survival. Further, clinical benefit is associated with the expression of immune activation signatures including a high MHC-I antigen processing and presentation score. These results improve our understanding of mechanisms behind clinical benefit of ACT in melanoma.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmExome SequencingHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMelanomaMutationPrognosisSequence Analysis, RNASkin NeoplasmsT-LymphocytesAntigens, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID29170503
PMCPMC5701046
OpenAlexW2768599330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.