Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29170486›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2018

Effects of lipid emulsion particle size on satiety and energy intake: a randomised cross-over trial.

Sally D Poppitt, Stephanie C Budgett, Alastair K MacGibbon, Siew-Young Quek, Sophie Kindleysides, Katy R Wiessing

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sally D PoppittHuman Nutrition Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. s.poppitt@auckland.ac.nz.
Stephanie C BudgettDepartment of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Alastair K MacGibbonFonterra Research and Development Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Siew-Young QuekDepartment of Food Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sophie KindleysidesHuman Nutrition Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Katy R WiessingHuman Nutrition Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZFonterra (New Zealand) · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesEmulsified lipids, with central lipid core surrounded by polar lipid 'protective coat', have been proposed to stimulate the ileal brake, alter appetite, food intake and aid weight control. In addition to lipid composition, emulsion particle size may contribute to efficacy with small droplets providing a larger surface area for gastrointestinal (GI) lipase action and larger droplets prolonging and delaying digestion in the GI tract. Tube feeding studies delivering emulsions directly into the small intestine show clear effects of smaller particle size on appetite and food intake, but evidence from oral feeding studies is sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of lipid emulsion particle size on appetite response and food intake. SUBJECTS/

methodsIn a three-arm randomised cross-over, high-phospholipid (PL) dairy lipid emulsions or matched control were consumed at breakfast within a yoghurt smoothie: (i) large-particle size emulsion, LPE (diameter 0.759 µm, 10 g lipid emulsion, 190 g yoghurt), (ii) small-particle size emulsion, SPE (diameter 0.290 µm, 10 g lipid emulsion, 190 g yoghurt), (iii) control non-emulsion, NE (10 g non-emulsion lipid, 190 g yoghurt). Twenty male participants completed the study, where postprandial appetite response was rated using visual analogue scales (VAS) and ad libitum energy intake at a lunch meal measured 3 h later.

resultsThere was a trend for LPE to suppress hunger (P = 0.08) and enhance fullness (P = 0.24) relative to both SPE and NE but not statistically significant, and no significant effect of either emulsion on food intake at the lunch meal (P > 0.05).

conclusionsAltering particle size of a high-PL emulsion did not enhance satiety or alter eating behaviour in a group of lean men.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAppetiteBreakfastCross-Over StudiesEmulsionsEnergy IntakeHumansLipidsMaleMiddle AgedParticle SizeSatiationYoung AdultEmulsionsLipids

Identifiers

PMID29170486
OpenAlexW2770847593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.