ArticleBMJ open2017
Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers.
Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Pooled it
- A low-cost approach to high quality responsible conduct of research education.International journal of ethics education · 2026Article
- Coercion Authorship: Ubiquitous and Preventable.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Article
- Conflict of Interest Disclosure in Oncology: Preliminary Insights From the Global ONCOTRUST-1 Cross-Sectional Study.JCO global oncology · 2024Article
- Is qualitative social research in global health fulfilling its potential?: a systematic evidence mapping of research on point-of-care testing in low- and middle-income contexts.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The missing voices in global health storytelling.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Advancing guideline quality through country-wide and regional quality assessment of CPGs using AGREE: a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Bridging the gap: promoting equity and diversity in global oncology research within Sub-Saharan Africa.BMJ oncology · 2023Article
- Awareness and perception of pharmacy researchers about conflict of interest: A study from the MENA region.Journal of applied pharmaceutical science · 2022Article
- Fostering research integrity in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Authorship trends in infectious diseases society of America affiliated journal articles conducted in low-income countries, 1998-2018.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers' Perceptions in Spain.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Article
- Institutional Approaches to Research Integrity in Ghana.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Review
- A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Decolonising global health: transnational research partnerships under the spotlight.International health · 2020Review
- Status, Respect, and Stigma: A Qualitative Study of Non-financial Interests in Medicine.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2020Article
- Improving Pediatric Academic Global Health Collaborative Research and Agenda Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Authorship in studies conducted in low-and-middle income countries and published by Reproductive Health: advancing equitable global health research collaborations.Reproductive health · 2020Article
- Article
- Principles of research ethics: A research primer for low- and middle-income countries.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo document low/middle-income country (LMIC) health researchers' views about authorship, redundant publication, plagiarism and conflicts of interest and how common poor practice was in their institutions.
designWe developed a questionnaire based on scenarios about authorship, redundant publication, plagiarism and conflicts of interest. We asked participants whether the described practices were acceptable and whether these behaviours were common at their institutions. We conducted in-depth interviews with respondents who agreed to be interviewed.
participantsWe invited 607 corresponding authors of Cochrane reviews working in LMICs. From the 583 emails delivered, we obtained 199 responses (34%). We carried out in-depth interviews with 15 respondents.
resultsSeventy-seven per cent reported that guest authorship occurred at their institution, 60% reported text recycling. For plagiarism, 12% of respondents reported that this occurred 'occasionally', and 24% 'rarely'. Forty per cent indicated that their colleagues had not declared conflicts of interest in the past. Respondents generally recognised poor practice in scenarios but reported that they occurred at their institutions. Themes identified from in-depth interviews were (1) authorship rules are simple in theory, but not consistently applied; (2) academic status and power underpin behaviours; (3) institutions and culture fuel bad practices and (4) researchers are uncertain about what conflict of interests means and how this may influence research.
conclusionsLMIC researchers report that guest authorship is widely accepted and common. While respondents report that plagiarism and undeclared conflicts of interest are unacceptable in practice, they appear common. Determinants of poor practice relate to academic status and power, fuelled by institutional norms and culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.