Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29170273›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Optimization of Quantitative Dynamic Postgadolinium MRI Technique Using Normalized Ratios for the Evaluation of Temporomandibular Joint Synovitis in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

P Caruso, K Buch, S Rincon, R Hakimelahi, Z S Peacock, C M Resnick, C Foster, L Guidoboni, T Donahue, R Macdonald and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P CarusoFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (P.C., K.B., S.R., R.H., C.F., L.G., T.D., R.M.) PCARUSO@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3050-0957
K BuchFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (P.C., K.B., S.R., R.H., C.F., L.G., T.D., R.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9579-8921
S RinconFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (P.C., K.B., S.R., R.H., C.F., L.G., T.D., R.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-0711
R HakimelahiFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (P.C., K.B., S.R., R.H., C.F., L.G., T.D., R.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1389-7681
Z S PeacockDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Mass General Hospital for Children (Z.S.P., L.B.K.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7683-3111
C M ResnickDepartment of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital (C.M.R.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-9618
C FosterFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (P.C., K.B., S.R., R.H., C.F., L.G., T.D., R.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7896-8132
L GuidoboniFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (P.C., K.B., S.R., R.H., C.F., L.G., T.D., R.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-827X
T DonahueFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (P.C., K.B., S.R., R.H., C.F., L.G., T.D., R.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1242-3030
R MacdonaldFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (P.C., K.B., S.R., R.H., C.F., L.G., T.D., R.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6413-8453
H RothermelDepartment of Pediatrics, Mass General Hospital for Children (H.R.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-2957
H D CurtinDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (H.D.C.), Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-9404
L B KabanDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Mass General Hospital for Children (Z.S.P., L.B.K.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-6876
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBoston Children's Hospital · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMR imaging has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the temporomandibular joint. Prior MR imaging approaches have relied mainly on the subjective interpretation of synovial enhancement as a marker for synovial inflammation. Although, more recently, several attempts have been made to quantify synovial enhancement, these methods have not taken into account the dynamic enhancement characteristics of the temporomandibular joint and the effect of sampling time. Our aim was to develop a clinically feasible, reproducible, dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR imaging technique for the quantitative assessment of temporomandibular joint synovitis in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and to study the effect of sampling time on the evaluation of synovitis. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective study of all patients who had dynamic, contrast-enhanced coronal T1 3T MR imaging through the temporomandibular joint at our institution between January 1, 2015, and July 8, 2016. Patients in this cohort included those with a history of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and control patients who underwent MR imaging for other routine, clinical purposes. Synovial enhancement was calculated for each temporomandibular joint using 3 different types of equations termed normalization ratios. The enhancement profiles generated by each equation were studied to determine which provided the best discrimination between affected and unaffected joints, was the least susceptible to sampling errors, and was the most clinically feasible.

resultsA ratio of synovial enhancement (defined as the difference between the postgadolinium and the pregadolinium T1 signal of the synovium) to the postgadolinium signal of the longus capitis provided the best discrimination between affected and unaffected joints, the least susceptibility to sampling error, and was thought to be the most clinically feasible method of quantification of synovial inflammation. Additional synovial enhancement ratios studied did not provide the same level rates of discrimination between the affected and unaffected joints and were thought to be too temporally variable to provide reliable clinical use.

conclusionsWe provide a robust, reproducible, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging technique for the quantitative assessment of temporomandibular joint synovitis in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArthritis, JuvenileChildContrast MediaFemaleGadoliniumHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesSynovitisTemporomandibular Joint DisordersYoung AdultContrast MediaGadolinium

Identifiers

PMID29170273
PMCPMC7963747
OpenAlexW2768995403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.