Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29170272›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: What Are the Latest Data?

R V Chandra, J Maingard, H Asadi, L-A Slater, T-L Mazwi, S Marcia, J Barr, J A Hirsch

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison between vertebroplasty with high or low viscosity cement augmentation or kyphoplasty in cement leakage rate for patients with vertebral compression fracture: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Real-world rates and risk factors for subsequent treatment with vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty after initial vertebral augmentation: a retrospective cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

R V ChandraFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology Unit (R.V.C., H.A., L.-A.S.), Monash Imaging, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia ronil.chandra@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7555-2297
J MaingardInterventional Neuroradiology Service (J.M., H.A.), Department of Radiology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8958-2411
H AsadiFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology Unit (R.V.C., H.A., L.-A.S.), Monash Imaging, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2475-9727
L-A SlaterFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology Unit (R.V.C., H.A., L.-A.S.), Monash Imaging, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-8664
T-L MazwiNeuroendovascular Program (T.-L.M., J.A.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-4191-2466
S MarciaDepartment of Radiology (S.M.), SS. Trinità Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2118-9864
J BarrInterventional Neuroradiology (J.B.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-5591-979X
J A HirschNeuroendovascular Program (T.-L.M., J.A.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9594-8798
Harvard University · USMonash Health · AUAustin Hospital · AUDeakin University · AUSantissima Trinità · ITThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures frequently result in significant morbidity and health care resource use. For patients with severe and disabling pain, vertebral augmentation (vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty) is often considered. Although vertebroplasty was introduced >30 years ago, there are conflicting opinions regarding the role of these procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. This review article updates clinicians on the published prospective randomized controlled data, including the most recent positive trials that followed initial negative trials in 2009. Analysis of multiple national claim datasets has also provided further insight into the utility of these procedures. Finally, we considered the recent recommendations of national organizations and medical societies that advise on the use of vertebral augmentation procedures for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionHumansKyphoplastyOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesTreatment OutcomeVertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID29170272
PMCPMC7410658
OpenAlexW2768609124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.