Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29170032›Full record

ArticleClinical breast cancer2018

Negative Valence Life Events Promote Breast Cancer Development.

Avital Fischer, Argyrios Ziogas, Hoda Anton-Culver

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical breast cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stressful Life Events and Distress in Breast Cancer: A 5-Years Follow-Up.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Avital FischerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA.
Argyrios ZiogasDepartment of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA.
Hoda Anton-CulverDepartment of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA. Electronic address: hantoncu@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008620 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GOLDIN, ALAN L · 1999 to 2023
$8.1M
HEREDITARY BREAST CANCER--GENETIC AND MOLECULAR STUDIESR01CA058860 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI ANTON-CULVER, HODA A · 1994 to 2008
$3.1M
HEREDITARY BREAST CANCER--GENETIC AND MOLECULAR STUDIESU01CA058860 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · PI ANTON-CULVER, HODA A. · 1997 to 2002
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058860NCI NIH HHS U01 CA058860NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe influence of stress on breast cancer risk remains unknown. The goal of the present study was to determine the effect of stress in the form of salient positive and negative valence life events (LEs) on primary invasive breast cancer risk. We hypothesized that salient negative LEs would increase breast cancer risk and salient positive LEs would attenuate this increased risk. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe used a case-control design with 664 cases identified through the Cancer Surveillance Program of Orange County and 203 population-based controls. Participants completed a risk factor questionnaire, which included a LE section. Fourteen salient LEs of positive or negative valence were used to quantify stress exposure. A baseline model was constructed, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariate unconditional logistic regression.

resultsNegative LEs were associated with increased breast cancer risk. The OR for ≥ 4 negative LEs showed a 2.81-fold increase in breast cancer risk (OR, 2.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-5.36). A significant dose-response relationship between lifetime negative valence LEs and breast cancer risk was found. Previous personal illness increased breast cancer risk by 3.6-fold (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.50-5.20). In contrast, abortion was associated with a 45% decrease in breast cancer risk (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89). Salient positive LEs did not have a significant effect on breast cancer risk. However, they seemed to buffer the adverse effect of salient negative LEs on breast cancer risk.

conclusionThe findings from the present study support the role of salient negative LEs in promoting breast cancer development, with a possible buffering effect of salient positive LEs.

Indexed as

Life Change EventsAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCaliforniaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceRisk FactorsStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBreast cancerCase-control studyEpidemiologyLEsStress

Identifiers

PMID29170032
PMCPMC6541225
OpenAlexW2767053249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.