Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29169892›Full record

ArticleVaccine2018

Immunization effects of a communication intervention to promote preteen HPV vaccination in primary care practices.

Joan R Cates, Jamie L Crandell, Sandra J Diehl, Tamera Coyne-Beasley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Increasing HPV Vaccination Uptake among Adolescents: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joan R CatesSchool of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3365, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3365, United States. Electronic address: JoanCates@unc.edu.
Jamie L CrandellSchool of Nursing and Department of Biostatistics, 2011 Carrington Hall, Campus Box 7460, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7460, United States. Electronic address: jbigelow@email.unc.edu.
Sandra J DiehlSchool of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3365, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3365, United States. Electronic address: diehl@email.unc.edu.
Tamera Coyne-BeasleyNC Child Health Research Network, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, CB # 7225, 231 MacNider, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States. Electronic address: tamera_coyne-beasley@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USResearch Network (United States) · US

Funding

Normalizing preteen HPV vaccination with practice-based communication strategiesR01AI113305 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CATES, JOAN ROBERTS · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI113305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHPV vaccination at the recommended ages of 11-12 is highly effective yet has stalled well below the goal of 80% of the population. We evaluated a statewide practice-based communication intervention (tools: brochures, posters, online training for providers and resources for parents, video game for preteens) to persuade parents, preteens and providers to vaccinate against HPV. The 9-month intervention started May 1, 2015.

methodsWe compared vaccine initiation and completion rates over three 9-month periods (baseline, intervention, post-intervention) between practices enrolled in the intervention and a comparable comparison group. All practices reported to the North Carolina Immunization Registry (NCIR) and had at least 100 11- and 12-year-olds who had not completed the HPV vaccine series. Of 175 eligible practices, the 14 intervention practices included 19,398 individuals and the 161 comparison practices included 127,896 individuals. An extended Cox model was used to test the intervention effect.

resultsThe intervention had a significant effect on both initiation and completion during the intervention and post-intervention periods; the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for initiation was 1.17 (p = .004) during the intervention and 1.11 (p = .005) post-intervention. Likewise, completion during the intervention period was 17% higher in intervention practices, after controlling for baseline differences. This effect increased in the post-intervention period to 30% higher (p = .03).

conclusionsIndividuals in the intervention practices were 17% more likely to initiate and complete HPV vaccination than in the comparison practices during the intervention period and the effect was sustained post-intervention. This intervention is promising for increasing rates of HPV vaccination at ages 11-12.

Indexed as

CommunicationAdolescentChildFemaleHumansImmunizationNorth CarolinaPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsPrimary Health CareProportional Hazards ModelsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescent healthHPV vaccinationImmunization registryInterventionPreteensPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID29169892
PMCPMC5725272
OpenAlexW2769593772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.