SynthesisImplementation science : IS2017
Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05449561 (Beyond Efficacy- Eliciting Preference for Face-to-face and Internet-based Psychotherapy Among People with Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Beyond Efficacy- Eliciting Preference for Face-to-face and Internet-based Psychotherapy Among People with Depression: Using Discrete Choice Experiment to Advance Future Service Implementation
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Driving factors in treatment decision-making of patients seeking medical assistance for infertility: a systematic review.Human reproduction update · 2024Pooled it
- Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Inform De-implementation of Mammography Overscreening: A US-Based National Survey.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Preferences for rapid implementation science: a real-time discrete choice experiment.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Cancer survivor preferences for breast cancer follow-up care: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Caregivers' Preference for Antipsychotic Medication for Youth Less Than 18 Years-Old: A Discrete Choice Experiment Pilot.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Whose Role Is It Anyway? Beneficiary Engagement During the Transition to Medicaid Managed Care in North Carolina.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2025Article
- Cancer patient preferences for traditional Chinese medicine treatment: a discrete choice experiment study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Using choice modelling to inform service sustainability for dementia Meeting Centres for people living with dementia in the UK.Aging & mental health · 2024Article
- High-dose chemotherapy for patients with stage III breast cancer with homologous recombination deficiency: a discrete choice experiment among healthcare providers.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
- Decision-making in the multiphase optimization strategy: Applying decision analysis for intervention value efficiency to optimize an information leaflet to promote key antecedents of medication adherence.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Women's preferences for HIV prevention service delivery in pharmacies during pregnancy in Western Kenya: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- Palliative care national plan implementation through stakeholder analysis.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Unpacking overuse of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer to inform de-implementation strategies.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Using stated preference methods to facilitate knowledge translation in implementation science.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Using decision analysis for intervention value efficiency to select optimized interventions in the multiphase optimization strategy.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024Article
- Discrete Choice Experiment in Evaluating Preferences for Physical Activity: A Mixed-Methods Study of Attributes and Their Levels.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Measuring the Implementation Preferences of Emergency Medical Services Clinicians Using Discrete Choice Experiments.Prehospital emergency care · 2024Article
- Comparing the Self-Reported Acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Utilizing deliberative engagement for identifying implementation strategy priorities: lessons learned from an online deliberative forum with dental professionals.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Creation of a theoretically rooted workbook to support implementers in the practice of knowledge translation.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne of the key strategies to successful implementation of effective health-related interventions is targeting improvements in stakeholder engagement. The discrete choice experiment (DCE) is a stated preference technique for eliciting individual preferences over hypothetical alternative scenarios that is increasingly being used in health-related applications. DCEs are a dynamic approach to systematically measure health preferences which can be applied in enhancing stakeholder engagement. However, a knowledge gap exists in characterizing the extent to which DCEs are used in implementation science.
methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search (up to December 2016) of the English literature to identify and describe the use of DCEs in engaging stakeholders as an implementation strategy. We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Econlit, PsychINFO, and the CINAHL using mesh terms. Studies were categorized according to application type, stakeholder(s), healthcare setting, and implementation outcome.
resultsSeventy-five publications were selected for analysis in this systematic review. Studies were categorized by application type: (1) characterizing demand for therapies and treatment technologies (n = 32), (2) comparing implementation strategies (n = 22), (3) incentivizing workforce participation (n = 11), and (4) prioritizing interventions (n = 10). Stakeholders included providers (n = 27), patients (n = 25), caregivers (n = 5), and administrators (n = 2). The remaining studies (n = 16) engaged multiple stakeholders (i.e., combination of patients, caregivers, providers, and/or administrators). The following implementation outcomes were discussed: acceptability (n = 75), appropriateness (n = 34), adoption (n = 19), feasibility (n = 16), and fidelity (n = 3).
conclusionsThe number of DCE studies engaging stakeholders as an implementation strategy has been increasing over the past decade. As DCEs are more widely used as a healthcare assessment tool, there is a wide range of applications for them in stakeholder engagement. The DCE approach could serve as a tool for engaging stakeholders in implementation science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.