Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29169378›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Network methods to support user involvement in qualitative data analyses: an introduction to Participatory Theme Elicitation.

Paul Best, Jennifer Badham, Rekesh Corepal, Roisin F O'Neill, Mark A Tully, Frank Kee, Ruth F Hunter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02455986 (A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Pedometer Based Phased Intervention to Encourage Physical Activity in Schools), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02455986 phase1completednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Pedometer Based Phased Intervention to Encourage Physical Activity in Schools: A Feasibility Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2015 to 2016Enrolled240ConditionsPhysical Activity, Health Behavior, Competitive Behavior, IncentivesArmsThe StepSmart Challenge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. 'Including us, talking to us and creating a safe environment'-Youth patient and public involvement and the Walking In ScHools (WISH) Study: Lessons learned.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. An exercise intervention for people with serious mental illness: Findings from a qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul BestSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University, Belfast, UK. p.best@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6947-8916
Jennifer BadhamSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4171-3897
Rekesh CorepalSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Roisin F O'NeillSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Mark A TullySchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Frank KeeSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Ruth F HunterSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is encouraged throughout the research process, engagement is typically limited to intervention design and post-analysis stages. There are few approaches to participatory data analyses within complex health interventions.

methodsUsing qualitative data from a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), this proof-of-concept study tests the value of a new approach to participatory data analysis called Participatory Theme Elicitation (PTE). Forty excerpts were given to eight members of a youth advisory PPI panel to sort into piles based on their perception of related thematic content. Using algorithms to detect communities in networks, excerpts were then assigned to a thematic cluster that combined the panel members' perspectives. Network analysis techniques were also used to identify key excerpts in each grouping that were then further explored qualitatively.

resultsWhile PTE analysis was, for the most part, consistent with the researcher-led analysis, young people also identified new emerging thematic content.

conclusionsPTE appears promising for encouraging user led identification of themes arising from qualitative data collected during complex interventions. Further work is required to validate and extend this method.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02455986 . Retrospectively Registered on 21 May 2015.

Indexed as

Healthy LifestyleQualitative ResearchSchool Health ServicesSystems AnalysisAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildChild BehaviorCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansNetwork analysisParticipatory analysisPatient and public involvementTrialsUser involvement

Identifiers

PMID29169378
PMCPMC5701364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.