Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29169340›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2017

Situational analysis of antibiotic use and resistance in Ghana: policy and regulation.

Saviour Kwame Yevutsey, Kwame Ohene Buabeng, Moses Aikins, Berko Panyin Anto, Richard B Biritwum, Niels Frimodt-Møller, Martha Gyansa-Lutterodt

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity ofBioMed research international · 2025
    Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Saviour Kwame YevutseyFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kwame Nkrumah University of Sciences and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. syevutsey@yahoo.com.
Kwame Ohene BuabengFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kwame Nkrumah University of Sciences and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Moses AikinsSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Berko Panyin AntoFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kwame Nkrumah University of Sciences and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Richard B BiritwumDepartment of Community Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Niels Frimodt-MøllerDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Unit 9301, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martha Gyansa-LutterodtDirector of Pharmaceutical Services, Ministry of Health, Accra, Ghana.
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHUniversity of Ghana · GHMinistry of Health · GHRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotics have played an essential role in decreasing morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases. However, indiscriminate use and unrestricted access is contributing to the emergence of bacterial resistance. This paper reports on a situational analysis of antimicrobial use and resistance in Ghana, with focus on policy and regulation.

methodsRelevant policy documents, reports, regulations and enactments were reviewed. PubMed and Google search engines were used to extract relevant published papers. Websites of stakeholders such as Ministry of Health (MOH) and its agencies were also reviewed. An interview guide was used to elicit responses from selected officials from these sectors.

resultsLaws and guidelines to control the use of antimicrobials in humans were available but not for animals. There was no National Antimicrobial Policy (NAP). A health practice regulatory law mandates Physicians, Physician Assistants, Midwives and trained Nurses to prescribe antimicrobials. However, antibiotics are widely prescribed and dispensed by unauthorised persons, suggesting weak enforcement of the laws. Antibiotics were also supplied to and from unapproved medicine outlets. The Standard Treatment Guidelines (STG), Essential Medicines List (EML) and the National Health Insurance Scheme Medicines List (NHISML) provide restrictions regarding levels of prescribing of antimicrobials. However, existing guidelines on antibiotic use are mostly not adhered to. The use of Automatic Stop Orders to avoid wastage in the hospitals is also not practiced. Data on use of antibiotics for individuals are not readily available in most facilities. Again, there are no standards or guidelines on veterinary use of antibiotics. Surveillance systems for consumption of antibiotics and resistance monitoring were not in place in most health facilities. However, there is an ongoing national action to create awareness on bacteria resistance, strengthening knowledge through research and surveillance and development of NAP in line with global action plan on antimicrobial resistance.

conclusionAbsence of national antimicrobial policy, weak regulatory environment and non-adherence to practice standards may have contributed to increased and unregulated access to antimicrobials in Ghana, a catalyst for development and spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MicrobialHealth PolicyLegislation, DrugAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsGhanaHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsGhanaPolicyRegulationSituational analysis

Identifiers

PMID29169340
PMCPMC5701378
OpenAlexW2768228521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.