Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29169332›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2017

How does pre-dialysis education need to change? Findings from a qualitative study with staff and patients.

Gill Combes, Kim Sein, Kerry Allen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Non-medical barriers reported by nephrologists when providing renal replacement therapy or comprehensive conservative management to end-stage kidney disease patients: a systematic review.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient Education in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Position Statement of the Polish Society of Nephrology.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring Healthcare Paradoxes in Hospital Haemodialysis-A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Decisional Needs of People From Minority Ethnic Groups Around Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A UK Healthcare Professionals' Perspective.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Results of the European EDITH nephrologist survey on factors influencing treatment modality choice for end-stage kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gill CombesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. g.combes@bham.ac.uk.
Kim SeinHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Kerry AllenHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1National Institute for Health Research wmclahrc-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-dialysis education (PDE) is provided to thousands of patients every year, helping them decide which renal replacement therapy (RRT) to choose. However, its effectiveness is largely unknown, with relatively little previous research into patients' views about PDE, and no research into staff views. This study reports findings relevant to PDE from a larger mixed methods study, providing insights into what staff and patients think needs to improve.

methodsSemi-structured interviews in four hospitals with 96 clinical and managerial staff and 93 dialysis patients, exploring experiences of and views about PDE, and analysed using thematic framework analysis.

resultsMost patients found PDE helpful and staff valued its role in supporting patient decision-making. However, patients wanted to see teaching methods and materials improve and biases eliminated. Staff were less aware than patients of how informal staff-patient conversations can influence patients' treatment decision-making. Many staff felt ill equipped to talk about all treatment options in a balanced and unbiased way. Patient decision-making was found to be complex and patients' abilities to make treatment decisions were adversely affected in the pre-dialysis period by emotional distress.

conclusionsSuggested improvements to teaching methods and educational materials are in line with previous studies and current clinical guidelines. All staff, irrespective of their role, need to be trained about all treatment options so that informal conversations with patients are not biased. The study argues for a more individualised approach to PDE which is more like counselling than education and would demand a higher level of skill and training for specialist PDE staff. The study concludes that even if these improvements are made to PDE, not all patients will benefit, because some find decision-making in the pre-dialysis period too complex or are unable to engage with education due to illness or emotional distress. It is therefore recommended that pre-dialysis treatment decisions are temporary, and that PDE is replaced with on-going RRT education which provides opportunities for personalised education and on-going review of patients' treatment choices. Emotional support to help overcome the distress of the transition to end-stage renal disease will also be essential to ensure all patients can benefit from RRT education.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedical Staff, HospitalQualitative ResearchAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicRenal DialysisYoung AdultCounsellingEmotional supportPatient choicePatient decision-makingPre-dialysis educationRenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID29169332
PMCPMC5701386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.