Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29169204›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2018

Newborn genetic screening for spinal muscular atrophy in the UK: The views of the general population.

Felicity K Boardman, Chloe Sadler, Philip J Young

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Public engagement with genomics.Wellcome open research · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. "EClinicalMedicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felicity K BoardmanDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3268-6276
Chloe SadlerSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Philip J YoungSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203384/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an inherited neuromuscular disorder and a leading genetic cause of infant death worldwide. However, there is no routine screening program for SMA in the UK. Lack of treatments and the inability of screening tests to accurately predict disease severity are among the key reasons implementation of screening has faltered in the UK. With the recent release of the first therapy for SMA (Nusinersen), calls are being made for a reconsideration of this stance; however, very little is known about the views of the general public.

methodsAn online survey was administered to 232 individuals with no prior relationship with SMA to assess their attitudes toward a newborn screening program for it. Results are compared with previously gathered data on the views of SMA-affected families toward screening.

resultsEighty-four percent of participants were in favor of newborn screening. Key reasons for support were a belief that it would lead to better healthcare and life expectancy for affected infants and facilitate informed decision-making for future pregnancies. Key reasons for nonsupport were a belief in the potential for significant negative impact on the family unit in terms of bonding and stress.

conclusionsPublic acceptability is a key component in the evaluation of any potential screening program in the UK. This study demonstrates that newborn screening for SMA is viewed largely positively by people unfamiliar with the condition. The importance of early identification overrode all other social and ethical concerns about screening for the majority of participants.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedFamilyFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInfant, NewbornInternetMaleMiddle AgedMuscular Atrophy, SpinalNeonatal ScreeningNeuromuscular DiseasesRisk Assessmentbloodspotethicsnewborn genetic screeningsocial implicationsspinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID29169204
PMCPMC5823674
OpenAlexW2765956637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.