Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29169182›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

Gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of hepatocholangiocarcinoma: an AGEO French multicentre retrospective study.

Maëva Salimon, Caroline Prieux-Klotz, David Tougeron, Vincent Hautefeuille, Morgane Caulet, Jérôme Gournay, Tamara Matysiak-Budnik, Jaafar Bennouna, Manuela Tiako Meyo, Thierry Lecomte and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maëva SalimonInstitut des Maladies de l'appareil Digestif, Nantes University Hospital, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes 44000, France.
Caroline Prieux-KlotzDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Paris 75014, France.
David TougeronDepartment of Gastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers 86600, France.
Vincent HautefeuilleAmiens University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Amiens 80054, France.
Morgane CauletTours University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tours 37000, France.
Jérôme GournayInstitut des Maladies de l'appareil Digestif, Nantes University Hospital, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes 44000, France.
Tamara Matysiak-BudnikInstitut des Maladies de l'appareil Digestif, Nantes University Hospital, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes 44000, France.
Jaafar BennounaInstitut des Maladies de l'appareil Digestif, Nantes University Hospital, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes 44000, France.
Manuela Tiako MeyoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris 75015, France.
Thierry LecomteTours University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tours 37000, France.
Aziz ZaananDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris 75015, France.
Yann TouchefeuInstitut des Maladies de l'appareil Digestif, Nantes University Hospital, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes 44000, France.
Université de Tours · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRHôpital Cochin · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-ICC) is a rare liver tumour for which no data on chemosensitivity exist. The aims of this multicentre study were to evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and prognostic factors in cHCC-ICC treated by gemcitabine plus platinum as first-line.

methodsUnresectable cHCC-ICC treated by gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy between 2008 and 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Diagnosis was based on histology or, in case of ICC or HCC histology, on discordant computerised tomography scan enhancement patterns associated with discordant serum tumour marker elevation suggesting the alternative tumour. OS and PFS were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors by Log-rank test and Cox model.

resultsAmong 30 patients included, cHCC-ICC was histologically proven in 22 (73.3%). 18 (60%) received gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX), 9 (30%) GEMOX plus bevacizumab, and 3 (10%) gemcitabine plus cisplatin. RECIST criteria were reported in 28 patients: 8 (28.6%) showed partial response, 14 (50%) stable disease, and 6 (21.4%) tumour progression at first evaluation. Median PFS and OS were 9.0 and 16.2 months, respectively. Serum bilirubin ⩾30 μmol l

conclusionsGemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy is effective as first-line for advanced cHCC-ICC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBilirubinCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaCisplatinDeoxycytidineDisease ProgressionFemaleFranceGemcitabineHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis C AntibodiesBevacizumabBilirubinCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis C AntibodiesOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID29169182
PMCPMC5808029
OpenAlexW2771017141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.