SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2018
Three-dimensional imaging of soft and hard facial tissues in patients with craniofacial syndromes: a systematic review of methodological quality.
Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Volumetric Analyses of Dysmorphic Maxillofacial Structures Using 3D Surface-Based Approaches: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo systematically review the methodological quality of three-dimensional imaging studies of patients with craniofacial syndromes and to propose recommendations for future research.
methodsPubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases as well as Grey literature were electronically searched. Inclusion criteria were patients with genetic syndromes with craniofacial manifestations and three-dimensional imaging of facial soft and/or hard tissues. Exclusion criteria consisted of non-syndromic conditions or conditions owing to environmental causes, injury or trauma, facial soft and hard tissues not included in the image analysis, case reports, reviews, opinion articles. No restrictions were made for patients' ethnicity nor age, publication language or publication date. Study quality was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS).
resultsThe search yielded 2228 citations of which 116 were assessed in detail and 60 were eventually included in this review. Studies showed a large heterogeneity in study design, sample size and patient age. An increase was observed in the amount of studies with time, and the imaging method most often used was CT. The most studied craniofacial syndromes were Treacher Collins, Crouzon and Apert syndrome. The articles could be divided into three main groups: diagnostic studies (34/60, 57%), evaluation of surgical outcomes (21/60, 35%) and evaluation of imaging techniques (5/60, 8%). For comparative studies, the median MINORS score was 13 (12-15, 25-75th percentile), and for non-comparative studies, the median MINORS score was 8 (7-9, 25-75th percentile).
conclusionsThe median MINORS scores were only 50 and 54% of the maximum scores and there was a lack of prospective, controlled trials with sufficiently large study groups. To improve the quality of future studies in this domain and given the low incidence of craniofacial syndromes, more prospective multicentre controlled trials should be set up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.