Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29168154›Full record

SynthesisProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2019

The Effect of Probiotics on Halitosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jun-Il Yoo, In-Soo Shin, Jae-Gyu Jeon, Yeon-Mi Yang, Jae-Gon Kim, Dae-Woo Lee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Interventions for managing halitosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Influence of the ProbioticMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  17. The Role of the Oral Microbiome in the Development of Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Probiotic Species in the Management of Periodontal Diseases: An Overview.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun-Il YooDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
In-Soo ShinDepartment of Education, College of Education, Jeonju University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Gyu JeonDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, BK21 Program, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Yeon-Mi YangDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Gon KimDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Dae-Woo LeeDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea. oklee@jbnu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9942-2400

Funding

Biomedical Research Institute, Chonbuk National University Hospital CUH2017-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although several studies have evaluated the inhibitory effect of probiotics on halitosis, findings are inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was conducted to summarize the evidence on the effect of probiotics on halitosis. RCT on any type of probiotic treatment with at least 2-week duration were identified through electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and hand searched between 1946 and January 17, 2017. Primary outcomes were organoleptic (OLT) scores and volatile sulfur compounds (VSC). Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the evidence. Of the 153 articles identified, three met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed that OLT scores (SMD = - 1.93, 95% CI - 2.85 to - 1.02, P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in subjects who received probiotics than in placebo groups, but no significant difference was observed at the VSC concentration (SMD = - 0.02, 95% CI - 2.12 to 2.07, P = 0.98). Current evidence is supportive of recommending probiotics for the management of halitosis. Based on this review, transient (average of 2 weeks) dosing with probiotics (mainly Lactobacillus strains) has a moderate effect on halitosis regarding OLT scores, but we could not confirm the effects of probiotics on the VSC reduction. The available evidence is quantitatively and qualitatively insufficient for further recommendations, especially with regard to administration strategies and pretreatment. Future studies should aim for longer follow-up and standardized administration methods to prove or refute the effect of probiotics on halitosis.

Indexed as

HalitosisHumansProbioticsSensationSulfur CompoundsSulfur CompoundsClinical practice guidelinesHalitosisPreventionProbioticsSupportive oral careSystematic reviews and evidence-based medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.