Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29168005›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice.

Paola Clauser, Ritse Mann, Alexandra Athanasiou, Helmut Prosch, Katja Pinker, Matthias Dietzel, Thomas H Helbich, Michael Fuchsjäger, Julia Camps-Herrero, Francesco Sardanelli and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05250674 (Clinical Evaluation of CEM-guided Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05250674 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Evaluation of CEM-guided Biopsy

TypeobservationalSponsorParc de Salut MarRan2019 to 2021Enrolled66ConditionsContrast Enhanced Mammography-guided BiopsyArmsCEM-guided biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Insights into imaging · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Paola ClauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ritse MannDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alexandra AthanasiouDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, "MITERA" Hospital, 6 Erythrou Stavrou Street, 151 23, Athens, Greece.
Helmut ProschDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias DietzelInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas H HelbichDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Michael FuchsjägerDivision of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9/P, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Julia Camps-HerreroDepartment of Radiology, Hospital de la Ribera, Carretera de Corbera, Km. 1, 46600, Alzira, Valencia, Spain.
Francesco SardanelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gabor ForraiDepartment of Radiology, Duna Medical Center, Lechner Ödön fasor 7, Budapest, 1095, Hungary.
Pascal A T BaltzerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. pascal.baltzer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Vienna General Hospital · ATHospital de La Ribera · ESMedical University of Graz · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATMitera Hospital · GRRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhile magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered a helpful diagnostic tool in breast imaging, discussions are ongoing about appropriate protocols and indications. The European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) launched a survey to evaluate the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice.

methodsAn online survey reviewed by the EUSOBI board and committees was distributed amongst members. The questions encompassed: training and experience; annual breast MRI and MRI-guided-intervention workload; examination protocols; indications; reporting habits and preferences. Data were summarised and subgroups compared using χ

resultsOf 647 EUSOBI members, 177 (27.4%) answered the survey. The majority were radiologists (90.5%), half of them based in academic centres (51.9%). Common indications for MRI included cancer staging, treatment monitoring, high-risk screening and problem-solving, and differed significantly between countries (p≤0.03). Structured reporting and BI-RADS were mostly used. Breast radiologists with ≤10 years of experience preferred inclusion of additional techniques, such as T2/STIR (p=0.03) and DWI (p=0.08) in the scan protocol. MRI-guided interventions were performed by a minority of participants (35.4%).

conclusionsThe utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice is generally in line with international recommendations. There are substantial differences between countries. MRI-guided interventions and functional MRI parameters are not widely available. KEY POINTS: • MRI is commonly used for the detection and characterisation of breast lesions. • Clinical practice standards are generally in line with current recommendations. • Standardised criteria and diagnostic categories (mainly BI-RADS) are widely adopted. • Younger radiologists value additional techniques, such as T2/STIR and DWI. • MRI-guided breast biopsy is not widely available.

Indexed as

Societies, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsEuropeFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedBreastMagnetic resonance imagingPractice GuidelineRadiologistsSurvey and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29168005
PMCPMC5882636
OpenAlexW2768286156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.