Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29167886›Full record

ReviewJAMA cardiology2018

Payment Reform to Enhance Collaboration of Primary Care and Cardiology: A Review.

Steven A Farmer, Paul N Casale, Linda D Gillam, John S Rumsfeld, Shari Erickson, Neil M Kirschner, Kevin de Regnier, Bruce R Williams, R Shawn Martin, Mark B McClellan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Steven A FarmerCenter for Healthcare Innovation and Policy Research, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Paul N CasaleAmerican College of Cardiology, Washington, DC.
Linda D GillamAmerican College of Cardiology, Washington, DC.
John S RumsfeldAmerican College of Cardiology, Washington, DC.
Shari EricksonAmerican College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Neil M KirschnerAmerican College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kevin de RegnierAmerican College of Osteopathic Family Physicians, Arlington Heights, Illinois.
Bruce R WilliamsAmerican College of Osteopathic Family Physicians, Arlington Heights, Illinois.
R Shawn MartinAmerican Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas.
Mark B McClellanDuke-Robert J. Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The US health care system faces an unsustainable trajectory of high costs and inconsistent outcomes. The fee-for-service payment model has contributed to inefficiency, and new payment methods are a promising approach to improving value. Health reforms are needed to increase patient access, reduce costs, and improve health care quality, and the landmark Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act presents a roadmap for reform. The product of a collaboration between primary care and cardiology clinicians, this review describes a conceptual approach to delivery and payment reforms that aim to better support primary care-cardiology comanagement of chronic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Observations: Few existing alternative payment models specifically address long-term management of CVD. Primary care medical homes and accountable care organizations come closest, but both emphasize primary care, and cardiologists have often not been well engaged. A collaborative care framework should articulate distinct roles and responsibilities for primary care and cardiology in CVD comanagement. Finally, a series of payment models aim to better support clinicians in providing accountable, seamless, and patient-centered cardiac care. Conclusions & Relevance: Clinical leadership is essential during this time of change in the health care system. Patients often struggle to navigate a fragmented and expensive system, whereas clinicians often practice with incomplete information about tests, treatments, and recommendations by their colleagues. The payment models described in this review offer an opportunity to create more satisfying approaches to patient care while improving value. These models have potential to support more effective coordination and to facilitate broader health care system transformation.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsCardiologyCardiovascular DiseasesHumansIntersectoral CollaborationPatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Management, MedicalPrimary Health CareReimbursement Mechanisms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.