Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29167834›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2017

Hypoactivation and Dysconnectivity of a Frontostriatal Circuit During Goal-Directed Planning as an Endophenotype for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Matilde M Vaghi, Adam Hampshire, Naomi A Fineberg, Muzaffer Kaser, Annette B Brühl, Barbara J Sahakian, Samuel R Chamberlain, Trevor W Robbins

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matilde M VaghiBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Adam HampshireCognitive Computational and Clinical Neurosciences Laboratory, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Naomi A FinebergNational Treatment Service for OCD (England and Wales), Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Muzaffer KaserDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Annette B BrühlBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Barbara J SahakianBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Samuel R ChamberlainBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Trevor W RobbinsBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G1000183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been postulated to result from impaired executive functioning and excessive habit formation at the expense of goal-directed control and have been objectively demonstrated using neuropsychological tests in such patients. This study tested whether there is functional hypoactivation as well as dysconnectivity of discrete frontostriatal pathways during goal-directed planning in patients with OCD and in their unaffected first-degree relatives.

methodsIn total, 21 comorbidity-free patients with OCD, 19 clinically asymptomatic first-degree relatives of these patients, and 20 control participants were tested on a functional magnetic resonance optimized version of the Tower of London task. Group differences in brain activation during goal-directed planning were measured together with associated frontostriatal functional connectivity.

resultsPatients with OCD and their clinically asymptomatic relatives manifested hypoactivation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during goal-directed planning coupled with reduced functional connectivity between this cortical region and the basal ganglia (putamen).

conclusionsHypoactivation of cortical regions associated with goal-directed planning and associated frontostriatal dysconnectivity represent a candidate endophenotype for OCD. These findings accord with abnormalities in neural networks supporting the balance between goal-directed and habitual behavior, with implications for recent neuropsychological theories of OCD and the major neurobiological model for this disorder.

Indexed as

ConnectivityEndophenotypeFrontostriatal circuitsGoal-directedObsessive-compulsive disorderPlanning

Identifiers

PMID29167834
PMCPMC5684958
OpenAlexW2625337450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.