Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29167833›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2017

Disorder-Specific and Shared Brain Abnormalities During Vigilance in Autism and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Christina O Carlisi, Luke Norman, Clodagh M Murphy, Anastasia Christakou, Kaylita Chantiluke, Vincent Giampietro, Andrew Simmons, Michael Brammer, Declan G Murphy, MRC AIMS Consortium and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Autism spectrum disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christina O CarlisiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopmental Sciences, London.
Luke NormanDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopmental Sciences, London.
Clodagh M MurphyDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopmental Sciences, London.
Anastasia ChristakouCentre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Kaylita ChantilukeDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopmental Sciences, London.
Vincent GiampietroDepartment of Neuroimaging, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London.
Andrew SimmonsDepartment of Neuroimaging, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London.
Michael BrammerDepartment of Neuroimaging, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London.
Declan G MurphyDepartment of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London.
MRC AIMS Consortium
David Mataix-ColsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience(DM-C), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katya RubiaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopmental Sciences, London.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1045Medical Research Council G0300155Medical Research Council G0400061Medical Research Council MR/N026063/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are often comorbid and share similarities across some cognitive phenotypes, including certain aspects of attention. However, no functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have compared the underlying neural mechanisms contributing to these shared phenotypes.

methodsAge- and IQ-matched boys (11-17 years old) with ASD (

resultsWhereas boys with ASD and OCD were not impaired on task performance, there was a significant group by attention load interaction in several brain regions. With increasing attention load, left inferior frontal cortex/insula and left inferior parietal lobe/pre/post-central gyrus were progressively less activated in boys with OCD relative to the other two groups. In addition, boys with OCD showed progressively increased activation with increasing attention load in rostromedial prefrontal/anterior cingulate cortex relative to boys with ASD and control boys. Shared neurofunctional abnormalities between boys with ASD and boys with OCD included increased activation with increasing attention load in cerebellum and occipital regions, possibly reflecting increased default mode network activation.

conclusionsThis first functional magnetic resonance imaging study to compare boys with ASD and OCD showed shared abnormalities in posterior cerebellar-occipital brain regions. However, boys with OCD showed a disorder-specific pattern of reduced activation in left inferior frontal and temporo-parietal regions but increased activation of medial frontal regions, which may potentially be related to neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive and clinical phenotypes of OCD.

Indexed as

AdolescenceASDAttentionfMRIOCDVigilance

Identifiers

PMID29167833
PMCPMC5685008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.