ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2017
Hepatocellular cancer and recurrence after liver transplantation: what about the impact of immunosuppression?
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Donor Age on Short-Term Outcomes After Pediatric Split Liver Transplantation.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Article
- Comparison of Sevoflurane and Desflurane on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Donor-recipient age mismatch and outcomes in liver transplantation: A scientific registry of transplant recipients database analysis.World journal of transplantation · 2025Article
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: Current Insights and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics elucidates the antitumor mechanisms of mycophenolic acid in bladder cancer cells.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Advancing Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Review
- Delayed brain metastasis in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation: a case report highlighting the predictive value of microvascular invasion.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- How to Estimate the Probability of Tolerance Long-Term in Liver Transplant Recipients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- High expression of RNF31 is associated with tumor immune cell infiltration and leads to poor prognosis in liver hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Does mtori base immunosuppression offer survival advantage after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Hepatology forum · 2023Review
- Liver transplantation for metastatic non-resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor after molecular targeted therapies: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2022Article
- Prognostic Factors for 10-Year Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Cancer Receiving Liver Transplantation.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Correlation analysis of RDM1 gene with immune infiltration and clinical prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Bioscience reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation is Associated with Episodes of Acute Rejections.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2021Article
- Impact of successful local ablative bridging therapy prior to liver transplantation on long-term survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Sirolimus-based immunosuppression improves outcomes in liver transplantation recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Hangzhou criteria.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Harnessing immunotherapy for liver recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a review from a transplant oncology perspective.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2019Review
- Center-driven and Clinically Driven Variation in US Liver Transplant Maintenance Immunosuppression Therapy: A National Practice Patterns Analysis.Transplantation direct · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) has originally been designed to treat hepatobiliary malignancies. The initial results of LT for hepatocellular cancer (HCC) were, however, dismal this mainly due to the poor patient selection procedure. Better surgical and perioperative care and, especially, the refinement of selection criteria led to a major improvement of results, making HCC nowadays (again!) one of the leading indications for LT. This evolution is clearly shown by the innumerable reports aiming to further extend inclusion criteria for LT in HCC patients. Nonetheless, the vast majority of papers only deals with morphologic (tumour diameter and number) and (only recently) biologic (tumour markers and response to locoregional treatment) parameters to do so. Curiously enough, the role of both the immune competent state of the recipient as well as the impact of both immunosuppression (IS) type and load has been very poorly addressed in this context, even if it has been shown for a long time, based on both basic and clinical research, that they all play a key role in the outcome of any oncologic treatment and in the development of de novo as well as recurrent tumours. This chapter aims to give, after a short introductive note about the currently used inclusion criteria of HCC patients for LT and about the role of IS in carcinogenesis, a comprehensive overview of the actual literature related to the impact of different immunosuppressive drugs and schemes on outcome of LT in HCC recipients. Unfortunately, up to now solid conclusions cannot be drawn due to the lack of high-level evidence studies caused by the heterogeneity of the studied patient cohorts and the lack of prospectively designed and randomized studies. Based on long-term personal experience with immunosuppressive handling in LT some proposals for further clinical research and practice are put forward. The strategy of curtailing and minimising IS should be explored in the growing field of transplant oncology taking thereby into account the immunological privilege of the liver allograft. These strategies will become more and more compelling when further extending the indications in which adjuvant chemotherapy will probably become an inherent part of the therapeutic scheme of HCC liver recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.