ArticleF1000Research2017
Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent.
Article in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Comprehensive Review of the Revolutionary Potential of Blockchain in Safe, Secure, and Sustainable Pharmaceutical Operations.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Pooled it
- Blockchain technology in healthcare: A systematic review.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Blockchain applications in health care for COVID-19 and beyond: a systematic review.The Lancet. Digital health · 2021Pooled it
- The Current State of Research, Challenges, and Future Research Directions of Blockchain Technology in Patient Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Real world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for Spiriva Respimat.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The benefits and challenges of blockchain in healthcare supply chain management in KSA: A systematic review.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing diabetes care: the role of artificial intelligence in prevention, diagnosis, and patient care.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- A Systematic Literature Review for Blockchain-Based Healthcare Implementations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Blockchain as a Prime Guardian: Securing Clinical Trial Data Integrity.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2025Review
- Blockchain-enabled quality by design system for clinical trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Blockchain technology and raft consensus for secure physician prescriptions and improved diagnoses in electronic healthcare systems.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Navigating the challenges of clinical trial professionals in the healthcare sector.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Scrybe: A Secure Audit Trail for Clinical Trial Data Fusion.Digital threats : research and practice · 2023Article
- Blockchain technology and application: an overview.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Telemedicine for diabetes management during COVID-19: what we have learnt, what and how to implement.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Re-engineering a Clinical Trial Management System Using Blockchain Technology: System Design, Development, and Case Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a blockchain-based dynamic consent platform (METORY) in a decentralized and multicenter clinical trial using virtual drugs.Clinical and translational science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trial consent for protocols and their revisions should be transparent for patients and traceable for stakeholders. Our goal is to implement a process allowing for collection of patients' informed consent, which is bound to protocol revisions, storing and tracking the consent in a secure, unfalsifiable and publicly verifiable way, and enabling the sharing of this information in real time. For that, we build a consent workflow using a trending technology called Blockchain. This is a distributed technology that brings a built-in layer of transparency and traceability. From a more general and prospective point of view, we believe Blockchain technology brings a paradigmatical shift to the entire clinical research field. We designed a Proof-of-Concept protocol consisting of time-stamping each step of the patient's consent collection using Blockchain, thus archiving and historicising the consent through cryptographic validation in a securely unfalsifiable and transparent way. For each protocol revision, consent was sought again. We obtained a single document, in an open format, that accounted for the whole consent collection process: a time-stamped consent status regarding each version of the protocol. This document cannot be corrupted and can be checked on any dedicated public website. It should be considered a robust proof of data. However, in a live clinical trial, the authentication system should be strengthened to remove the need for third parties, here trial stakeholders, and give participative control to the peer users. In the future, the complex data flow of a clinical trial could be tracked by using Blockchain, which core functionality, named Smart Contract, could help prevent clinical trial events not occurring in the correct chronological order, for example including patients before they consented or analysing case report form data before freezing the database. Globally, Blockchain could help with reliability, security, transparency and could be a consistent step toward reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.