Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29167631›Full record

ArticlePhytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe2017

Towards eco-friendly crop protection: natural deep eutectic solvents and defensive secondary metabolites.

Sanae Mouden, Peter G L Klinkhamer, Young Hae Choi, Kirsten A Leiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Secondary Metabolites inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanae MoudenResearch Group Plant Ecology and Phytochemistry, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter G L KlinkhamerResearch Group Plant Ecology and Phytochemistry, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Young Hae ChoiNatural Products Laboratory, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kirsten A LeissResearch Group Plant Ecology and Phytochemistry, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With mounting concerns over health and environmental effects of pesticides, the search for environmentally acceptable substitutes has amplified. Plant secondary metabolites appear in the horizon as an attractive solution for green crop protection. This paper reviews the need for changes in the techniques and compounds that, until recently, have been the mainstay for dealing with pest insects. Here we describe and discuss main strategies for selecting plant-derived metabolites as candidates for sustainable agriculture. The second part surveys ten important insecticidal compounds, with special emphasis on those involved in human health. Many of these insecticidal metabolites, however, are crystalline solids with limited solubility which might potentially hamper commercial formulation. As such, we introduce the concept of natural deep eutectic solvents for enhancing solubility and stability of such compounds. The concept, principles and examples of green pest control discussed here offer a new suite of environmental-friendly tools designed to promote and adopt sustainable agriculture.

Indexed as

InsecticidalMetabolomicsNADESPlant protection compoundsSolubility

Identifiers

PMID29167631
PMCPMC5674125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.