Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29167487›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comparative metagenomics of hydrocarbon and methane seeps of the Gulf of Mexico.

Adrien Vigneron, Eric B Alsop, Perrine Cruaud, Gwenaelle Philibert, Benjamin King, Leslie Baksmaty, David Lavallée, Bartholomeus P Lomans, Nikos C Kyrpides, Ian M Head and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Adrien VigneronSchool of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. avignero@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3552-8369
Eric B AlsopShell International Exploration and Production Inc., Houston, Texas, USA.
Perrine CruaudINRA, UMR1062 CBGP, F-34988, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.
Gwenaelle PhilibertShell International Exploration and Production Inc., Houston, Texas, USA.
Benjamin KingShell International Exploration and Production Inc., Houston, Texas, USA.
Leslie BaksmatyShell International Exploration and Production Inc., Houston, Texas, USA.
David LavalléeShell International Exploration and Production Inc., Houston, Texas, USA.
Bartholomeus P LomansShell Global Solutions International B.V., Rijswijk, Netherlands.
Nikos C KyrpidesDOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Ian M HeadSchool of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Nicolas TsesmetzisShell International Exploration and Production Inc., Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5246-0568
Shell (France) · FRJoint Genome Institute · USAgropolis International · FRNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oil and gas percolate profusely through the sediments of the Gulf of Mexico, leading to numerous seeps at the seafloor, where complex microbial, and sometimes animal communities flourish. Sediments from three areas (two cold seeps with contrasting hydrocarbon composition and a site outside any area of active seepage) of the Gulf of Mexico were investigated and compared. Consistent with the existence of a seep microbiome, a distinct microbial community was observed in seep areas compared to sediment from outside areas of active seepage. The microbial community from sediments without any influence from hydrocarbon seepage was characterized by Planctomycetes and the metabolic potential was consistent with detrital marine snow degradation. By contrast, in seep samples with methane as the principal hydrocarbon, methane oxidation by abundant members of ANME-1 was likely the predominant process. Seep samples characterized by fluids containing both methane and complex hydrocarbons, were characterized by abundant Chloroflexi (Anaerolinaceae) and deltaproteobacterial lineages and exhibited potential for complex hydrocarbon degradation. These different metabolic capacities suggested that microorganisms in cold seeps can potentially rely on other processes beyond methane oxidation and that the hydrocarbon composition of the seep fluids may be a critical factor structuring the seafloor microbial community composition and function.

Indexed as

ArchaeaDeltaproteobacteriaGammaproteobacteriaGulf of AmericaHydrocarbonsMetagenomicsMethaneSeawaterHydrocarbonsMethane

Identifiers

PMID29167487
PMCPMC5700182
OpenAlexW2768216965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.