Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29167224›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2017

Implementation of a Learning Assistant Program Improves Student Performance on Higher-Order Assessments.

Nadia Sellami, Shanna Shaked, Frank A Laski, Kevin M Eagan, Erin R Sanders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Undergraduate Learning Assistants Using Online Messaging Improves Student Educational Experiences in Large Neuroscience Lecture Courses.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Students Need More than Content Knowledge To Counter Vaccine Hesitancy.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadia SellamiDivision of Undergraduate Education, Undergraduate Research Center-Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 nadia.sellami.ucla@gmail.com.
Shanna ShakedCenter for Education Innovation & Learning in the Sciences, Divisions of Life and Physical Sciences, College of Letters and Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Frank A LaskiDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology and Core Education Department, Division of Life Sciences, College of Letters and Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Kevin M EaganGSE&IS, CIRP, and Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Erin R SandersCenter for Education Innovation & Learning in the Sciences and Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, Divisions of Life and Physical Sciences, College of Letters and Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning assistant (LA) programs have been implemented at a range of institutions, usually as part of a comprehensive curricular transformation accompanied by a pedagogical switch to active learning. While this shift in pedagogy has led to increased student learning gains, the positive effect of LAs has not yet been distinguished from that of active learning. To determine the effect that LAs would have beyond a student-centered instructional modality that integrated active learning, we introduced an LA program into a large-enrollment introductory molecular biology course that had already undergone a pedagogical transformation to a highly structured, flipped (HSF) format. We used questions from a concept test (CT) and exams to compare student performance in LA-supported HSF courses with student performance in courses without LAs. Students in the LA-supported course did perform better on exam questions common to both HSF course modalities but not on the CT. In particular, LA-supported students' scores were higher on common exam questions requiring higher-order cognitive skills, which LAs were trained to foster. Additionally, underrepresented minority (URM) students particularly benefited from LA implementation. These findings suggest that LAs may provide additional learning benefits to students beyond the use of active learning, especially for URM students.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceEducational MeasurementLearningStudentsDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMolecular BiologyProblem-Based LearningSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29167224
PMCPMC5749964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.