ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2017
[Efficacy and Survival Analysis of Apatinib in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Failure of First-line Treatment].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of BRAF-mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway on biological characteristics and chemosensitivity of NSCLC A549/DDP cells.Oncology letters · 2021Article
- Efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib in ovarian cancer patients with platinum-resistance or platinum-refractoriness: A single-center retrospective study.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Effects of Apatinib on the "Stemness" of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells In Vivo and Its Related Mechanisms.Canadian respiratory journal · 2020Article
- [Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Combined with Chemotherapy as Second-line or Later-line Treatment in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2018Article
- Efficacy and safety of apatinib treatment for gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of second or third-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is low. The use of targeted drugs brings survival benefit for some patients. Apatinib, as a novel small molecule antiangiogenic drug, has demonstrated satisfactory anticancer activity across a broad range of malignancies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC after first-line treatment failure.
methodsA retrospective study of 128 patients was conducted to evaluate the safety, short-term efficacy and survival status with different regimens. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used for analysis.
resultsCompared with chemotherapy alone, the median progression free survival (PFS) in apatinib monotherapy, chemotherapy alone and apatinib combined with chemotherapy were 3.0 (P=0.381), 3.7 and 6.0 months (P<0.001), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) were 6.0 (P=0.494), 6.5 and 9.0 months (P=0.001), respectively. The incidence of adverse events in grades 3-4 were 18.5%, 15.8% and 16.0%, respectively (P=0.947). Different treatment regimens (P=0.018) and performance status (PS)(P<0.001) were the independent factors of PFS. The smoking history (P=0.014), treatment regimens (P=0.002) and PS (P<0.001) were independent influencing factors of OS.
conclusionsApatinib has a good security. After first-line treatment failure of lung cancer, chemotherapy combined with apatinib in second or third-line is beneficial in PFS and OS when compared with chemotherapy alone. But when making comparison between apatinib monotherapy and chemotherapy alone, there is no significant difference in PFS and OS. Patients who never smoke or has a better PS or use combination therapy have longer survival time. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.