ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2017
[Association between the ALK Gene Status and the Efficacy of First-line Pemetrexed Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Whole-process Management of Treatment of Advanced ALK Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021Article
- Icotinib and pemetrexed in treatment of lung adenocarcinoma and the effects on prognostic survival rate of patients.Oncology letters · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is one of the major driver genes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several studies have shown that the efficacy of pemetrexed in ALK-positive lung cancer is controversial. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in patients with ALK-positive and negative lung adenocarcinoma.
methodsThe clinical data of 98 cases of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS), V-rafmurine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF)-negative patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who diagnosed by histopathology from January 2015 to April 2016 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were collected. The relationships between ALK gene status, clinical characteristics and response and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.
resultsAll of the 98 patients' ALK status were determined. ALK gene fracture fusion occured in 34 cases (34.7%), no fracture fusion in 64 cases (65.3%). All patients underwent first-line pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy, the objective response rate (ORR) was 21.4% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 84.7%. The ORR and DCR of patients with ALK fracture fusion were higher than those without fracture fusion (41.2% vs 10.9%, χ2=23.389, P<0.001; 91.2% vs 81.3%, χ2=4.153, P=0.042), the difference was statistically significant. ALK gene status was not related to age, gender, smoking history and clinical stage. The median PFS of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma was 7.1 months (95%CI: 6.1-8.1) and negative was 4.7 months (95%CI: 3.818-5.582), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=13.269, P<0.001). Cox multivariate analysis indicates that PFS of pemetrexed combined with platinum chemotherapy was independent of gender, age, smoking, staging and platinum. ALK gene fracture fusion is an independent factor affecting PFS (HR=0.392, 95%CI: 0.243-0.634, P<0.001).
conclusionsALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients with first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy have greater clinical benefit than ALK-negative patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.