Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29166929›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2017

Prevalence of dietary supplement use and associated factors among female college students in Saudi Arabia.

Hanan Alfawaz, Nasiruddin Khan, Aziza Alfaifi, Fatima M Shahrani, Huda M Al Tameem, Seetah F Al Otaibi, Weaam I Abudigin, Mohammad S Al-Shayaa, Saad A Al-Ghanim, Nasser M Al-Daghri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The use of dietary supplements for mental health among the Saudi population: A cross-sectional survey.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Dietary Intake and Supplement Use Among Saudi Residents during COVID-19 Lockdown.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hanan AlfawazCollege of Food Science & Agriculture, Department of Food Science & Nutrition, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nasiruddin KhanCollege of Applied Sciences, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, A'Sharqiyah University, Ibra, 400, Sultanate of Oman.
Aziza AlfaifiCollege of Food Science & Agriculture, Department of Food Science & Nutrition, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fatima M ShahraniCollege of Food Science & Agriculture, Department of Food Science & Nutrition, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Huda M Al TameemCollege of Food Science & Agriculture, Department of Food Science & Nutrition, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Seetah F Al OtaibiCollege of Food Science & Agriculture, Department of Food Science & Nutrition, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Weaam I AbudiginCollege of Food Science & Agriculture, Department of Food Science & Nutrition, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad S Al-ShayaaDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, College of Foods and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saad A Al-GhanimHealth and Hospital Administration Program, Department of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser M Al-DaghriPrince Mutaib Chair for Biomarkers of Osteoporosis, Biochemistry Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. aldaghri2011@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5472-1725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe economic boom in Saudi Arabia indirectly prompted the use of dietary supplements in the last two decades. Our aim is to investigate the prevalence of dietary supplement use and its association with sociodemographic/lifestyle characteristics among Saudi female students.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 534 female participants (≥19 years of age) completed a self-administered questionnaire that include sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics, perceived health status, dietary supplement use, general awareness, attitudes and behavior.

resultsIn all participants, the prevalence of dietary supplement use was 76.6% (n = 409). High level of education (p = 0.002) and more physical activity (p = 0.008) exhibited a significant positive association with users than to non-users. The frequency showed that beta-carotene (54.2%), chamomile (54.2%), and glucosamine (53.8%) were the most preferred diet supplements under the category "when needed". Cod liver oil (71.3%), omega 3 (68.3%), multi-vitamins (61.5%), ginseng (60%), and vitamin A (60%), were mostly used "from time to time". Multi-minerals (34.4%) were the preferred choice when it comes to daily use. The main reasons for supplement use were to "maintain healthy hair" and "injury and illness" (both 26.2%). About 38.4% were not aware and 30.3% disagree on differences taking supplements with or without consulting a medical professional. About 36.7% lack information about side effects while, 35.0% were unaware about any health effect of dietary supplements.

conclusionThe prevalence of dietary supplement use was high in Saudi female students and was significantly associated with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors.

Indexed as

Health StatusAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArabsCross-Sectional StudiesDietDietary SupplementsExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSaudi ArabiaSocioeconomic FactorsDietary supplementsLifestyleSaudi ArabiaSociodemographic

Identifiers

PMID29166929
PMCPMC5700706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.