ArticleArthritis research & therapy2017
Childhood Takayasu arteritis: disease course and response to therapy.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Anti-TNF and Anti-IL-6 Treatments for Pediatric Takayasu Arteritis: Addressing a Therapeutic Dilemma.Paediatric drugs · 2025Pooled it
- Real-World Biomarkers for Pediatric Takayasu Arteritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Prevalence of tuberculosis infection among patients with Takayasu arteritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of Takayasu arteritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
- 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Guideline
- 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis.Arthritis care & research · 2021Guideline
- Wind of Change in the Treatment of Childhood-Onset Takayasu Arteritis: a Systematic Review.Current rheumatology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Home-Based Exercise Training in Childhood-Onset Takayasu Arteritis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Trial
- Age specific clinical manifestations and vascular involvements in childhood-onset Takayasu arteritis.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- New avenues in childhood vasculitis.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Review
- Childhood-onset Takayasu arteritis: clinical presentation, challenges and disease course.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Article
- Vasculitis in Children.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Article
- Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Takayasu's arteritis (2023).Rheumatology and immunology research · 2024Review
- Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcome of 43 Cases of Infant-Onset Takayasu Arteritis.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Outcomes in children with rheumatic diseases following COVID-19 vaccination and infection: data from a large two-center cohort study in Thailand.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- An Update on Childhood-Onset Takayasu Arteritis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Takayasu Arteritis Presenting as Intestinal Angina: Unusual Presentation of a Rare Disease.Cureus · 2022Article
- Tuberculosis in Children with Rheumatic Diseases Treated with Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in Pediatric Vasculitis.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTakayasu arteritis (TAK) is a large vessel vasculitis that rarely affects children. Data on childhood TAK are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the presenting features, course and outcome of children with TAK, compare efficacy of treatment regimens and identify high-risk factors for adverse outcome.
methodsA single-center cohort study of consecutive children fulfilling the EULAR/PRINTO/PReS criteria for childhood TAK between 1986 and 2015 was performed. Clinical phenotypes, laboratory markers, imaging features, disease course and treatment were documented. Disease activity was assessed using the Pediatric Vasculitis Disease Activity Score at each visit. OUTCOME: disease flare defined as new symptoms and/or increased inflammatory markers necessitating therapy escalation and/or new angiographic lesions, or death. ANALYSIS: logistic regression tested relevant variables for flare. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared treatment regimens.
resultsTwenty-seven children were included; 74% were female, median age at diagnosis was 12.4 years. Twenty-two (81%) children presented with active disease at diagnosis. Treatment regimens included corticosteroids alone (15%), corticosteroids plus methotrexate (37%), cyclophosphamide (19%), or a biologic agent (11%). Adverse outcomes were documented in 14/27 (52%) children: two (7%) died within 6 months of diagnosis, and 13 (48%) experienced disease flares. The 2-year flare-free survival was 80% with biologic treatments compared to 43% in non-biologic therapies (p = 0.03); at last follow-up, biologic therapies resulted in significantly higher rates of inactive disease (p = 0.02). No additional outcome predictor was identified.
conclusionsChildhood TAK carries a high disease burden; half of the children experienced flares and 7% died. Biologic therapies were associated with better control of disease activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.