Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29166917›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2017

Collaborative action for person-centred coordinated care (P3C): an approach to support the development of a comprehensive system-wide solution to fragmented care.

Helen M Lloyd, Mark Pearson, Rod Sheaff, Sheena Asthana, Hannah Wheat, Thava Priya Sugavanam, Nicky Britten, Jose Valderas, Michael Bainbridge, Louise Witts and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessing the experience of person-centred coordinated care of people with chronic conditions in the Netherlands: Validation of the Dutch P3CEQ.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Helen M LloydCommunity and Primary Care Research Group, Clinical Trails and Population Studies, Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Room N14, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BX, United Kingdom. helen.lloyd-1@plymouth.ac.uk.
Mark PearsonNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, United Kingdom.
Rod SheaffSchool of Law, Criminology and Government, University of Plymouth, Portland Villas, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
Sheena AsthanaSchool of Law, Criminology and Government, University of Plymouth, Portland Villas, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
Hannah WheatCommunity and Primary Care Research Group, Clinical Trails and Population Studies, Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Room N14, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BX, United Kingdom.
Thava Priya SugavanamCommunity and Primary Care Research Group, Clinical Trails and Population Studies, Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Room N14, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BX, United Kingdom.
Nicky BrittenNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, United Kingdom.
Jose ValderasNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, United Kingdom.
Michael BainbridgePrimary Care Development Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group, Working Together to Improve Health and Wellbeing, Wynford House, Lufton Way, Yeovil, Somerset, BA22 8HR, United Kingdom.
Louise WittsSouth West Academic Health Science Network, Pynes Hill Court, Pynes Hill, Exeter, EX2 5AZ, United Kingdom.
Debra WestlakeCommunity and Primary Care Research Group, Clinical Trails and Population Studies, Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Room N14, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BX, United Kingdom.
Jane HorrellCommunity and Primary Care Research Group, Clinical Trails and Population Studies, Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Room N14, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BX, United Kingdom.
Richard ByngCommunity and Primary Care Research Group, Clinical Trails and Population Studies, Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Room N14, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BX, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health 09/1801/1063Department of Health HS&DR/15/77/34SW Peninsula CLAHRC & SW AHSN none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFragmented care results in poor outcomes for individuals with complexity of need. Person-centred coordinated care (P3C) is perceived to be a potential solution, but an absence of accessible evidence and the lack of a scalable 'blue print' mean that services are 'experimenting' with new models of care with little guidance and support. This paper presents an approach to the implementation of P3C using collaborative action, providing examples of early developments across this programme of work, the core aim of which is to accelerate the spread and adoption of P3C in United Kingdom primary care settings.

methodsTwo centrally funded United Kingdom organisations (South West Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care and South West Academic Health Science Network) are leading this initiative to narrow the gap between research and practice in this urgent area of improvement through a programme of service change, evaluation and research. Multi-stakeholder engagement and co-design are core to the approach. A whole system measurement framework combines outcomes of importance to patients, practitioners and health organisations. Iterative and multi-level feedback helps to shape service change while collecting practice-based data to generate implementation knowledge for the delivery of P3C. The role of the research team is proving vital to support informed change and challenge organisational practice. The bidirectional flow of knowledge and evidence relies on the transitional positioning of researchers and research organisations.

resultsExtensive engagement and embedded researchers have led to strong collaborations across the region. Practice is beginning to show signs of change and data flow and exchange is taking place. However, working in this way is not without its challenges; progress has been slow in the development of a linked data set to allow us to assess impact innovations from a cost perspective. Trust is vital, takes time to establish and is dependent on the exchange of services and interactions. If collaborative action can foster P3C it will require sustained commitment from both research and practice. This approach is a radical departure from how policy, research and practice traditionally work, but one that we argue is now necessary to deal with the most complex health and social problems.

Indexed as

Comprehensive Health CareCooperative BehaviorHealth ServicesHealth Services ResearchPrimary Health CareProgram DevelopmentTranslational Research, BiomedicalDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based PracticeHealth PolicyHumansStakeholder ParticipationUnited KingdomCollaborative actionIntegrationPerson-centred coordinated care

Identifiers

PMID29166917
PMCPMC5700670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.