ArticleHealth research policy and systems2017
Collaborative action for person-centred coordinated care (P3C): an approach to support the development of a comprehensive system-wide solution to fragmented care.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Barriers, Enablers, and Impacts of Implementing National Comprehensive Care Standards in Acute Care Hospitals: An Interview Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- The impact of an online, lifestyle intervention programme on the lives of patients with a rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a pilot study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Person-centered support for patients with a pituitary tumor following surgery.Endocrine connections · 2025Article
- Patient Experiences and Prerequisites of Collaboration as Partners in Person-Centred Care: An Interview Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- An action plan: The Swedish healthcare pathway for adults with chronic pain.Scandinavian journal of pain · 2025Review
- Identification of implementation enhancement strategies for national comprehensive care standards using the CFIR-ERIC approach: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- New models of health and social care for people in later life: mapping of innovation in services in two regions of the United Kingdom using a mixed method approach.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The implementation and impacts of the Comprehensive Care Standard in Australian acute care hospitals: a survey study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Community-based person-centred integrated care (PIC) networks for healthy ageing in place: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- The development and structural validity testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory-Care (PCPI-C).PloS one · 2024Article
- Person-Centered Coordinated Care Experience of People With Long-Term Conditions in the Balearic Islands Measured by the P3CEQ.Health services insights · 2024Article
- The implementation and impacts of national standards for comprehensive care in acute care hospitals: An integrative review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023Review
- Effect of patient-related factors on hospitalization service satisfaction and recommendation intention of medical institutions in Korea.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Evaluating step-down, intermediate care programme in Buckinghamshire, UK: a mixed methods study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Opinion: pelvic floor disorders: learning from chronicity & chronic care models.Frontiers in global women's health · 2023Article
- Assessing the experience of person-centred coordinated care of people with chronic conditions in the Netherlands: Validation of the Dutch P3CEQ.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Evaluating a Novel Extended Scope of Occupational Therapy Service Aimed at Hospital Avoidance in Tasmania, Australia, from the Perspective of Stakeholders.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Mortality gap and physical comorbidity of people with severe mental disorders: the public health scandal.Annals of general psychiatry · 2021Article
- Testing cost containment of future healthcare with maintained or improved quality-The COSTCARES project.Health science reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFragmented care results in poor outcomes for individuals with complexity of need. Person-centred coordinated care (P3C) is perceived to be a potential solution, but an absence of accessible evidence and the lack of a scalable 'blue print' mean that services are 'experimenting' with new models of care with little guidance and support. This paper presents an approach to the implementation of P3C using collaborative action, providing examples of early developments across this programme of work, the core aim of which is to accelerate the spread and adoption of P3C in United Kingdom primary care settings.
methodsTwo centrally funded United Kingdom organisations (South West Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care and South West Academic Health Science Network) are leading this initiative to narrow the gap between research and practice in this urgent area of improvement through a programme of service change, evaluation and research. Multi-stakeholder engagement and co-design are core to the approach. A whole system measurement framework combines outcomes of importance to patients, practitioners and health organisations. Iterative and multi-level feedback helps to shape service change while collecting practice-based data to generate implementation knowledge for the delivery of P3C. The role of the research team is proving vital to support informed change and challenge organisational practice. The bidirectional flow of knowledge and evidence relies on the transitional positioning of researchers and research organisations.
resultsExtensive engagement and embedded researchers have led to strong collaborations across the region. Practice is beginning to show signs of change and data flow and exchange is taking place. However, working in this way is not without its challenges; progress has been slow in the development of a linked data set to allow us to assess impact innovations from a cost perspective. Trust is vital, takes time to establish and is dependent on the exchange of services and interactions. If collaborative action can foster P3C it will require sustained commitment from both research and practice. This approach is a radical departure from how policy, research and practice traditionally work, but one that we argue is now necessary to deal with the most complex health and social problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.