Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29166137›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Primary constrained TIPS for treating refractory ascites or variceal bleeding secondary to hepatic cirrhosis.

R Rabei, S Mathevosian, J Tasse, S Madassery, B Arslan, U Turba, O Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Expandable Constrained Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: An Individualised Approach for High-Risk Patients?Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How Controlled is the Expansion of VIATORR CX?Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient.Clinical liver disease · 2021
    Review
  8. Current Management of Intestinal Stomas and Their Complications.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R Rabei1 Chicago Medical School , Rosalind Franklin University , North Chicago, IL , USA.
S Mathevosian1 Chicago Medical School , Rosalind Franklin University , North Chicago, IL , USA.
J Tasse2 Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL , USA.
S Madassery2 Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL , USA.
B Arslan2 Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL , USA.
U Turba2 Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL , USA.
O Ahmed2 Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report an initial experience using a primary constrained transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) technique for treating cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites or variceal bleeding.

methodsAll patients undergoing primary constrained (n = 9) and conventional (n = 18) TIPS between July 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Preprocedure demographics, Child-Pugh, model for end-stage liver disease and technical variables were recorded. Outcomes measured included technical and clinical success, complications, 30-day mortality, as well as necessity for TIPS revision. Average (SD) and median follow-up was 237 (190) and 226 days.

resultsAll constrained and conventional TIPS were technically successful (100%). Clinical success as defined as a reduction or improvement in presenting symptoms was 88.9% (8/9) and 100% (18/18) in the constrained and conventional groups, respectively (p = 1). The average reduction in portosystemic gradient was lower in the constrained group, 6.1 mmHg compared with 10.6 mmHg in the conventional group (p = 0.73). The rate of hepatic encephalopathy following TIPS placement was higher in the conventional group [16.7% (3/18)] compared with 0% in the constrained group (p = 0.52). The percentage of patients requiring TIPS revision was lower in the constrained group, although the results were not significant (11.1 vs 22.2%, p = 0.63).

conclusionPrimary constrained TIPS is a feasible modification to conventional TIPS with similar technical and clinical success rates. A trend towards a smaller reduction in the portosystemic gradient and need for revision was observed in the constrained group. Advances in knowledge: Primary constrained TIPS allows for greater stepwise control over shunt diameter and may represent an improved technique for patients at risk for hepatic encephalopathy.

Indexed as

AscitesEsophageal and Gastric VaricesFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticRadiography, InterventionalTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29166137
PMCPMC5965479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.