Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29165837›Full record

Trial reportMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2018

Pulse duration settings in subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson's disease.

Frank Steigerwald, Lars Timmermann, Andrea Kühn, Alfons Schnitzler, Martin M Reich, Anna Dalal Kirsch, Michael Thomas Barbe, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Julius Hübl, Christoph van Riesen and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of short pulse and conventional deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Toward Electrophysiology-Based Intelligent Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. An update on adaptive deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Frank SteigerwaldDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Lars TimmermannDepartments of Neurology and Functional & Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany.
Andrea KühnDepartment of Neurology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
Alfons SchnitzlerDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Martin M ReichDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Anna Dalal KirschDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Michael Thomas BarbeDepartments of Neurology and Functional & Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany.
Veerle Visser-VandewalleDepartments of Neurology and Functional & Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany.
Julius HüblDepartment of Neurology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
Christoph van RiesenDepartment of Neurology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
Stefan Jun GroissDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Alexia-Sabine MoldovanDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sherry LinBoston Scientific Neuromodulation, Valencia, California, USA.
Stephen CarcieriBoston Scientific Neuromodulation, Valencia, California, USA.
Ljubomir ManolaBoston Scientific Neuromodulation, Diegem, Belgium.
Jens VolkmannDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStimulation parameters in deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease (PD) are rarely tested in double-blind conditions. Evidence-based recommendations on optimal stimulator settings are needed. Results from the CUSTOM-DBS study are reported, comparing 2 pulse durations.

methodsA total of 15 patients were programmed using a pulse width of 30 µs (test) or 60 µs (control). Efficacy and side-effect thresholds and unified PD rating scale (UPDRS) III were measured in meds-off (primary outcome). The therapeutic window was the difference between patients' efficacy and side effect thresholds.

resultsThe therapeutic window was significantly larger at 30 µs than 60 µs (P = ·0009) and the efficacy (UPDRS III score) was noninferior (P = .00008).

interpretationSubthalamic neurostimulation at 30 µs versus 60 µs pulse width is equally effective on PD motor signs, is more energy efficient, and has less likelihood of stimulation-related side effects. © 2017 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

AgedBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsDeep Brain StimulationDouble-Blind MethodElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseSeverity of Illness IndexSubthalamic NucleusTime FactorsDeep brain stimulationParkinson's diseasepulse widthstimulation parameterssubthalamic

Identifiers

PMID29165837
PMCPMC5813170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.