Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29165683›Full record

SynthesisOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2017

Systematic Review: Occupational illness in the waste and recycling sector.

C J M Poole, S Basu

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Macular degeneration and occupational risk factors: a systematic review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Work-Related Asthma From Exposure to Cardboard and Paper Products.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Microplastics and Human Health: A Global Public Health Crisis.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Respiratory Diseases Associated With Organic Dust Exposure.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cytotoxicity ofToxins · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Application of impedance measurement to investigate in vitro inhalation toxicity of bacteria.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C J M PooleDepartment of Occupational Health, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
S BasuDepartment of Occupational Health, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe waste and recycling sector is a growing part of industry. Whether health surveillance is indicated and how it should be undertaken is unclear.

aimsTo undertake a review of the literature to identify hazards to health, biological effects and occupational illnesses for workers in the sector.

methodsA systematic review of the published literature and two UK databases.

resultsRates of fatal, non-fatal injuries and self-reported work-related illness were found to be higher in the waste and recycling sector than in UK industry as a whole. There was an increased prevalence of respiratory, gastro-intestinal and skin complaints in workers exposed to compost relative to controls. They may also be at increased risk of extrinsic allergic alveolitis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, occupational asthma and abnormalities of lung function. Workers involved with the recycling of batteries and cables may be at risk of lead poisoning and exposure to other heavy metals. There were case reports of mercury poisoning from the recycling of fluorescent lights. Cases of occupational asthma have been reported in association with wood and paper recycling. The recycling of e-waste may cause exposure to heavy metals and organic pollutants, such as polybrominated diphenyl ethers, dioxins and polyaromatic hydrocarbons, which have been associated with damage to DNA and adverse neonatal outcomes.

conclusionsIll-health and adverse biological effects have been described in waste and recycling workers, but their true prevalence has probably not been captured. Targeted health surveillance may be required to assess exposure and to identify occupational illness.

Indexed as

Manufacturing IndustryHumansOccupational DiseasesPrevalenceRecyclingWaste Disposal FacilitiesWorkforceBiological monitoringhealth surveillancerecyclingsystematic reviewwaste

Identifiers

PMID29165683
PMCPMC5927023
OpenAlexW2768965048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.