Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29165667›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

BRAF V600E Mutation-Assisted Risk Stratification of Solitary Intrathyroidal Papillary Thyroid Cancer for Precision Treatment.

Yueye Huang, Shen Qu, Guangwu Zhu, Fei Wang, Rengyun Liu, Xiaopei Shen, David Viola, Rossella Elisei, Efisio Puxeddu, Laura Fugazzola and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Impact ofCancers · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Concepts of Pathological Staging and Prognosis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  19. Nuclear interaction of Arp2/3 complex and BRAFAmerican journal of cancer research · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

Yueye HuangLaboratory for Cellular and Molecular Thyroid Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Shen QuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism and the Shanghai Research Center of Thyroid Diseases, The Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Guangwu ZhuLaboratory for Cellular and Molecular Thyroid Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Fei WangLaboratory for Cellular and Molecular Thyroid Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Rengyun LiuLaboratory for Cellular and Molecular Thyroid Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Xiaopei ShenLaboratory for Cellular and Molecular Thyroid Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
David ViolaEndocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Rossella EliseiEndocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Efisio PuxedduDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Laura FugazzolaDivision of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, and Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan Italy.
Carla ColomboDivision of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, and Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan Italy.
Barbara JarzabMaria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Agnieszka CzarnieckaMaria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Alfred K LamCancer Molecular Pathology of School of Medicine and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Caterina MianDepartment of Medicine, Endocrinology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Federica VianelloVeneto Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Linwah YipUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Garcilaso Riesco-EizaguirreDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition Hospital Universitario La Paz and Hospital, Universitario de Mostoles, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Pilar SantistebanBiomedical Research Institute "Alberto Sols," Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas and Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Christine J O'NeillEndocrine Surgical Unit, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mark S SywakEndocrine Surgical Unit, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Roderick Clifton-BlighEndocrine Surgical Unit, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Bela BendlovaDepartment of Molecular Endocrinology Institute of Endocrinology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vlasta SýkorováDepartment of Molecular Endocrinology Institute of Endocrinology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Mingzhao XingLaboratory for Cellular and Molecular Thyroid Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Sydney · AUInstitute of Endocrinology · CZJohns Hopkins Medicine · USThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITGriffith University · AUInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Sols-Morreale · ESIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITShanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CNUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Genetic & Epigenetic Events in Papillary Thyroid CancerR01CA113507 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI XING, MICHAEL MINGZHAO · 2006 to 2015
$2.2M
TERT Promoter Mutations in Thyroid CancerR01CA189224 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI XING, MICHAEL MINGZHAO · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Older Age and BRAF-positivity as Risk Modifiers for Papillary Thyroid CancerR03AG042334 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YIP, LIN · 2012 to 2013
$148k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113507NCI NIH HHS R01 CA189224NIA NIH HHS R03 AG042334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Precise risk stratification-based treatment of solitary intrathyroidal papillary thyroid cancer (SI-PTC) that is larger than 1.0 cm and 4.0 cm or less is undefined. Methods: A genetic-clinical risk study was performed on BRAF V600E in 955 patients (768 women and 187 men) with SI-PTC, with median age of 46 years and median clinical follow-up time of 64 months at 11 medical centers in six countries. The chi-square test or, for analyses with small numbers, Fisher's exact test was performed to compare recurrence rates. Recurrence-free probability was estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, and the independent effect of BRAF mutation on the recurrence was analyzed by Cox regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Recurrence of SI-PTC larger than 1.0 cm and 4.0 cm or less was 9.5% (21/221) vs 3.4% (11/319) in BRAF mutation vs wild-type BRAF patients, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.46 to 6.30) and a patient age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio of 3.10 (95% CI = 1.49 to 6.45, P = .002). Recurrence rates of SI-PTC larger than 2.0 cm and 4.0 cm or less were 16.5% (13/79) vs 3.6% (5/139) in mutation vs wild-type patients (HR = 5.44, 95% CI = 1.93 to 15.34; and adjusted HR = 5.58, 95% CI = 1.96 to 15.85, P = .001). Recurrence rates of SI-PTC larger than 3.0 cm and 4 cm or less were 30.0% (6/20) vs 1.9% (1/54) in mutation vs wild-type patients (HR = 18.40, 95% CI = 2.21 to 152.98; and adjusted HR = 14.73, 95% CI = 1.74 to 124.80, P = .01). Recurrences of mutation-positive SI-PTC were comparable with those of counterpart invasive solitary PTC, around 20% to 30%, in tumors larger than 2.0 cm to 3.0 cm. BRAF mutation was associated with a statistically significant decrease in recurrence-free patient survival on KM analysis, particularly in SI-PTC larger than 2.0 cm and 4.0 cm or less. Similar results were obtained in conventional SI-PTC. The negative predictive values of BRAF mutation for recurrence were 97.8% (95% CI = 96.3% to 98.8%) for general SI-PTC and 98.2% (95% CI = 96.3% to 99.3%) for conventional SI-PTC. Conclusions: BRAF V600E identifies a subgroup of SI-PTC larger than 1.0 cm and 4.0 cm or less, particularly tumors larger than 2.0 cm and 4.0 cm or less, that has high risk for recurrence comparable with that of invasive solitary PTC, making more aggressive treatment reasonable.

Indexed as

MutationPrecision MedicineAdultBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, PapillaryFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafRisk AssessmentSurvival RateThyroid NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID29165667
PMCPMC6658860
OpenAlexW2769039655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.