ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2018
Long-term health in recipients of transplanted in vitro propagated spermatogonial stem cells.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Views of male childhood cancer survivors on fertility preservation and restoration.Reproduction & fertility · 2025Article
- Is the time right for transplanting immature testicular tissue or cells to restore male fertility? Expert perspectives on clinical implementation of autotransplantation of cryopreserved testicular tissue or cells for fertility restoration.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025Review
- The effect of epididymosomes on the development of frozen-thawed mouse spermatogonial stem cells after culture in a decellularized testicular scaffold and transplantation into azoospermic mice.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Sperm DNA methylation is predominantly stable in mice offspring born after transplantation of long-term cultured spermatogonial stem cells.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Article
- Perspectives: Approaches for Studying Livestock Spermatogonia.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Spermatogonial Stem Cell-Based Therapies: Taking Preclinical Research to the Next Level.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Impact of restoring male fertility with transplantation of in vitro propagated spermatogonial stem cells on the health of their offspring throughout life.Clinical and translational medicine · 2021Article
- Sperm Selection Procedures for Optimizing the Outcome of ICSI in Patients with NOA.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Is It Possible to Treat Infertility with Stem Cells?Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Review
- Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis and XY-Body FormationFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- In Vitro Meiosis of Male Germline Stem Cells.Stem cell reports · 2020Article
- ITGA6+ Human Testicular Cell Populations Acquire a Mesenchymal Rather than Germ Cell Transcriptional Signature during Long-Term Culture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Stem cell-based therapies for fertility preservation in males: Current status and future prospects.World journal of stem cells · 2020Review
- Approaches and Technologies in Male Fertility Preservation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Fertility preservation in boys: recent developments and new insightsHuman reproduction open · 2020Article
- Article
- Does co-transplantation of mesenchymal and spermatogonial stem cells improve reproductive efficiency and safety in mice?Stem cell research & therapy · 2019Article
- Oncofertility: Pharmacological Protection and Immature Testicular Tissue (ITT)-Based Strategies for Prepubertal and Adolescent Male Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Role of stem cells in fertility preservation: current insights.Stem cells and cloning : advances and applications · 2019Article
- A practical blueprint to systematically study life-long health consequences of novel medically assisted reproductive treatments.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionIs testicular transplantation of in vitro propagated spermatogonial stem cells associated with increased cancer incidence and decreased survival rates in recipient mice? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cancer incidence was not increased and long-term survival rate was not altered after transplantation of in vitro propagated murine spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) in busulfan-treated recipients as compared to non-transplanted busulfan-treated controls. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Spermatogonial stem cell autotransplantation (SSCT) is a promising experimental reproductive technique currently under development to restore fertility in male childhood cancer survivors. Most preclinical studies have focused on the proof-of-principle of the functionality and efficiency of this technique. The long-term health of recipients of SSCT has not been studied systematically. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study was designed as a murine equivalent of a clinical prospective study design. Long-term follow-up was performed for mice who received a busulfan treatment followed by either an intratesticular transplantation of in vitro propagated enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) positive SSCs (cases, n = 34) or no transplantation (control, n = 37). Using a power calculation, we estimated that 36 animals per group would be sufficient to provide an 80% power and with a 5% level of significance to demonstrate a 25% increase in cancer incidence in the transplanted group. The survival rate and cancer incidence was investigated until the age of 18 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsNeonatal male B6D2F1 actin-eGFP transgenic mouse testis were used to initiate eGFP positive germline stem (GS) cell culture, which harbor SSCs. Six-week old male C57BL/6 J mice received a single dose busulfan treatment to deplete the testis from endogenous spermatogenesis. Half of these mice received a testicular transplantation of cultured eGFP positive GS cells, while the remainder of mice served as a control group. Mice were followed up until the age of 18 months (497-517 days post-busulfan) or sacrificed earlier due to severe discomfort or illness. Survival data were collected. To evaluate cancer incidence a necropsy was performed and tissues were collected. eGFP signal in transplanted testis and in benign and malignant lesions was assessed by standard PCR. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We found 9% (95% CI: 2-25%) malignancies in the transplanted busulfan-treated animals compared to 26% (95% CI: 14-45%) in the busulfan-treated control group, indicating no statistically significant difference in incidence of malignant lesions in transplanted and control mice (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-1.1). Furthermore, none of the malignancies that arose in the transplanted animals contained eGFP signal, suggesting that they are not derived from the in vitro propagated transplanted SSCs. Mean survival time after busulfan treatment was found to be equal, with a mean survival time for transplanted animals of 478 days and 437 days for control animals (P = 0.076). LARGE SCALE DATA: NA. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although we attempted to mimic the future clinical application of SSCT in humans as close as possible, the mouse model that we used might not reflect all aspects of the future clinical setting. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThe absence of an increase in cancer incidence and a decrease in survival of mice that received a testicular transplantation of in vitro propagated SSCs is reassuring in light of the future clinical application of SSCT in humans. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by KiKa (Kika86) and ZonMw (TAS 116003002). The authors report no financial or other conflict of interest relevant to the subject of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.